PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFFDX vs. PRPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFFDX vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund (FFFDX) and Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFDX achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly higher than PRPFX's 2.90% return. Over the past 10 years, FFFDX has underperformed PRPFX with an annualized return of 7.74%, while PRPFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.50% annualized return.


FFFDX

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.65%
YTD
7.25%
6M
7.07%
1Y
16.36%
3Y*
11.81%
5Y*
5.10%
10Y*
7.74%

PRPFX

1D
-0.48%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
2.90%
6M
1.48%
1Y
17.94%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
10.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFDX vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFFDX
Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund
7.25%14.87%7.32%12.85%-16.06%8.97%13.81%17.97%-5.30%13.88%
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Class I
2.90%28.78%19.36%11.96%-5.48%10.87%18.80%19.20%-7.02%11.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFDX and PRPFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 1996

0.67

The correlation between FFFDX and PRPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFFDX vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFDX
FFFDX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FFFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PRPFX
PRPFX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PRPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PRPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFDX vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund (FFFDX) and Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFFDXPRPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.29

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

2.19

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.11

5.60

+7.51

FFFDX vs. PRPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the PRPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFDX and PRPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFFDX vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFDX drawdown since its inception was -45.53%, which is greater than PRPFX's maximum drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFDX and PRPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFDXPRPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.53%

-27.16%

-18.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.50%

-8.40%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.75%

-8.40%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-15.49%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.58%

-20.84%

-1.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-7.95%

+7.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-3.52%

-3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

3.28%

-1.99%

Volatility

FFFDX vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund (FFFDX) is 3.11%, while Permanent Portfolio Class I (PRPFX) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that FFFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFDXPRPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

3.65%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.38%

11.64%

-5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.48%

12.92%

-5.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.97%

11.10%

-2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.01%

10.67%

-1.66%

FFFDX vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFDX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFFDX vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison

FFFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than PRPFX's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFDX
Fidelity Freedom 2020 Fund
7.56%7.36%4.67%2.63%9.81%12.06%6.88%6.54%7.10%2.95%3.62%3.92%
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Class I
3.17%3.27%1.86%1.39%1.58%2.05%5.38%4.69%6.90%2.14%0.95%7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFFDX and PRPFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRPFX has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to FFFDX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFDX dropped -45.53% vs PRPFX's -27.16%.

FFFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFFDX and PRPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer