PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFEZX vs. FNCMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFEZX vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEZX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFEZX achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than FNCMX's 8.42% return. Over the past 10 years, FFEZX has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 9.90%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.98% annualized return.


FFEZX

1D
1.35%
1M
-0.66%
6M
5.01%
YTD
7.22%
1Y
16.05%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
9.90%
ALL TIME*
9.14%

FNCMX

1D
2.78%
1M
-2.76%
6M
7.39%
YTD
8.42%
1Y
22.35%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
17.98%
ALL TIME*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FFEZX vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFEZX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class
7.22%17.36%11.27%17.31%-17.55%13.80%15.58%24.92%-6.72%20.40%
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
8.42%21.11%29.48%45.13%-32.40%22.21%44.57%36.63%-3.07%28.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FFEZX and FNCMX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.88

The correlation between FFEZX and FNCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFEZX vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFEZX
FFEZX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FFEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FFEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FNCMX
FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFEZX vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEZX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFEZXFNCMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.19

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.51

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.96

5.07

+3.89

FFEZX vs. FNCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFEZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFEZX and FNCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFEZX vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFEZX drawdown since its inception was -28.46%, smaller than the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEZX and FNCMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFEZXFNCMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.46%

-55.08%

+26.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-13.01%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.02%

-24.20%

+13.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.83%

-35.64%

+10.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.46%

-35.64%

+7.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-7.19%

+5.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.46%

-7.84%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

3.87%

-2.18%

Volatility

FFEZX vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFEZX) is 2.81%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that FFEZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFEZXFNCMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

5.64%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

14.70%

-6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

18.42%

-8.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.01%

22.79%

-10.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.30%

22.15%

-8.85%

FFEZX vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFEZX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFEZX vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

FFEZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than FNCMX's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFEZX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Institutional Premium Class
2.63%2.80%2.54%2.13%2.08%2.04%2.18%16.18%2.27%1.85%2.01%2.04%
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
0.47%0.51%0.61%0.67%0.88%0.47%0.67%4.41%1.93%0.03%1.01%1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFEZX and FNCMX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNCMX has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to FFEZX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFEZX dropped -28.46% vs FNCMX's -55.08%.

FFEZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFEZX and FNCMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer