SIXO vs. FFEB
Compare and contrast key facts about AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB).
SIXO and FFEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIXO is a passively managed fund by Allianz that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Sep 30, 2021. FFEB is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series. It was launched on Feb 21, 2020. Both SIXO and FFEB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SIXO or FFEB.
Correlation
The correlation between SIXO and FFEB is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SIXO vs. FFEB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SIXO:
1.94
FFEB:
2.35
SIXO:
2.65
FFEB:
3.26
SIXO:
1.40
FFEB:
1.48
SIXO:
2.95
FFEB:
3.31
SIXO:
13.81
FFEB:
16.56
SIXO:
0.93%
FFEB:
0.98%
SIXO:
6.62%
FFEB:
6.98%
SIXO:
-12.04%
FFEB:
-22.81%
SIXO:
-0.76%
FFEB:
-0.38%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXO achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly higher than FFEB's 1.32% return.
SIXO
1.39%
0.69%
7.63%
12.65%
N/A
N/A
FFEB
1.32%
0.76%
7.45%
16.22%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIXO vs. FFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FFEB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SIXO vs. FFEB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SIXO
FFEB
SIXO vs. FFEB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SIXO vs. FFEB - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIXO nor FFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SIXO vs. FFEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXO drawdown since its inception was -12.04%, smaller than the maximum FFEB drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXO and FFEB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SIXO vs. FFEB - Volatility Comparison
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) has a higher volatility of 2.29% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) at 1.50%. This indicates that SIXO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.