FFDKX vs. GABGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFDKX (Fidelity Fund Class K) and GABGX (Gabelli Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FFDKX returned 15.46%/yr vs 16.63%/yr for GABGX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FFDKX charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.34%/yr for GABGX.

Performance

FFDKX vs. GABGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fund Class K (FFDKX) and Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFDKX achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly lower than GABGX's 6.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FFDKX has underperformed GABGX with an annualized return of 15.46%, while GABGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.63% annualized return.

FFDKX

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 3.69%
• 6M: 4.50%
• 1Y: 23.32%
• 3Y*: 21.52%
• 5Y*: 13.37%
• 10Y*: 15.46%

GABGX

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 4.45%
• YTD: 6.28%
• 6M: 5.73%
• 1Y: 20.75%
• 3Y*: 25.01%
• 5Y*: 12.46%
• 10Y*: 16.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFDKX vs. GABGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFDKX Fidelity Fund Class K	3.69%	20.13%	27.24%	31.03%	-25.81%	33.32%	26.55%	33.57%	-5.23%	23.35%
GABGX Gabelli Growth Fund	6.28%	18.67%	35.38%	45.39%	-39.04%	22.48%	39.11%	34.19%	1.89%	29.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FFDKX and GABGX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2008	0.95

The correlation between FFDKX and GABGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFDKX vs. GABGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFDKX

FFDKX Risk / Return Rank: 41
FFDKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FFDKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FFDKX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FFDKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FFDKX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

GABGX

GABGX Risk / Return Rank: 19
GABGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
GABGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
GABGX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
GABGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
GABGX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFDKX vs. GABGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fund Class K (FFDKX) and Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFDKX	GABGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.39	+0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	1.96	+0.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.24	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	1.30	+0.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.35	4.46	+4.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFDKX vs. GABGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFDKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the GABGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFDKX and GABGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFDKX	GABGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	1.39	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.53	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.74	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.55	-0.01

Drawdowns

FFDKX vs. GABGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFDKX drawdown since its inception was -52.66%, smaller than the maximum GABGX drawdown of -66.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFDKX and GABGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFDKX	GABGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.66%	-66.39%	+13.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.86%	-16.53%	+5.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.41%	-22.39%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.28%	-42.36%	+12.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.65%	-42.36%	+11.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-0.72%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	-16.69%	+8.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	4.79%	-2.23%

Volatility

FFDKX vs. GABGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fund Class K (FFDKX) is 2.81%, while Gabelli Growth Fund (GABGX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that FFDKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFDKX	GABGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.81%	3.62%	-0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.06%	12.08%	-3.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.53%	15.47%	-2.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.17%	23.45%	-4.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.43%	22.51%	-3.08%

FFDKX vs. GABGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFDKX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GABGX's 1.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFDKX vs. GABGX - Dividend Comparison

FFDKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than GABGX's 5.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFDKX Fidelity Fund Class K	1.21%	1.25%	0.00%	2.48%	0.74%	4.67%	2.77%	5.49%	7.51%	11.18%	7.12%	5.60%
GABGX Gabelli Growth Fund	5.16%	5.49%	6.27%	1.66%	0.00%	5.03%	7.02%	11.48%	5.66%	6.28%	5.17%	8.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFDKX and GABGX in my portfolio?

FFDKX and GABGX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFDKX or GABGX?

GABGX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to FFDKX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFDKX dropped -52.66% vs GABGX's -66.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFDKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.