PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FESM vs. FHLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FESM vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FESM vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
0.82%17.88%16.22%12.19%
FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF
-4.97%15.42%2.48%7.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FESM achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly higher than FHLC's -4.97% return.


FESM

1D
3.29%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
0.82%
6M
4.42%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FHLC

1D
2.28%
1M
-7.46%
YTD
-4.97%
6M
5.95%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
5.07%
10Y*
9.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FESM vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FESM has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FESM vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FESM
FESM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FESM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FESM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FESM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FESM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FESM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLC
FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FESM vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FESMFHLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

0.26

+1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.87

0.48

+1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.06

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

0.51

+1.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.40

1.08

+7.32

FESM vs. FHLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FESM Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the FHLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FESM and FHLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FESMFHLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

0.26

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.61

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between FESM and FHLC is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FESM vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison

FESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than FHLC's 1.44% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
0.63%0.82%1.08%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF
1.44%1.40%1.51%1.40%1.30%1.16%1.45%1.18%1.38%1.38%1.40%2.07%

Drawdowns

FESM vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FESM drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, smaller than the maximum FHLC drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FESM and FHLC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FESMFHLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.93%

-28.76%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.54%

-10.38%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.23%

-7.99%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-5.16%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

5.04%

-1.51%

Volatility

FESM vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 5.14%. This indicates that FESM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FESMFHLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.40%

5.14%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.26%

10.26%

+4.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.98%

17.61%

+5.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

14.85%

+6.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.49%

16.82%

+4.67%