PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEMB vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEMB vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMB achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than FNILX's 9.63% return.


FEMB

1D
-0.54%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.72%
1Y
10.10%
3Y*
6.76%
5Y*
2.12%
10Y*
1.85%

FNILX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.34%
YTD
9.63%
6M
8.65%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEMB vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FEMB
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF
0.58%21.77%-5.61%17.12%-10.50%-13.40%3.16%11.52%1.84%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
9.63%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FEMB and FNILX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEMB vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMB
FEMB Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEMB vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEMBFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.94

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.06

12.99

-8.93

FEMB vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMB and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEMB vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMB drawdown since its inception was -30.44%, smaller than the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMB and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMBFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.44%

-33.76%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-9.01%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.13%

-19.08%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

-25.40%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-1.73%

-2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.90%

-5.35%

-4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.03%

+0.46%

Volatility

FEMB vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) is 2.86%, while Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that FEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMBFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

4.82%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.89%

9.90%

-3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.61%

12.61%

-4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.27%

17.34%

-7.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.85%

20.04%

-9.19%

FEMB vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEMB vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than FNILX's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEMB
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF
6.06%5.67%6.09%5.15%6.35%6.12%5.29%5.40%5.86%6.38%5.83%4.89%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.92%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEMB and FNILX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNILX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FEMB (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEMB dropped -30.44% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FNILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEMB and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer