FEM vs. SPYG
FEM (First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEM returned 10.00%/yr vs 18.34%/yr for SPYG. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEM charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
FEM vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEM achieves a 20.65% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 11.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FEM has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 10.00%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.34% annualized return.
FEM
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 20.65%
- 6M
- 20.82%
- 1Y
- 42.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 31.61%
- 3Y*
- 26.51%
- 5Y*
- 14.78%
- 10Y*
- 18.34%
FEM vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEM First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund | 20.65% | 28.36% | 3.01% | 10.84% | -14.24% | 7.40% | -1.68% | 20.55% | -15.51% | 41.05% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 11.38% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEM and SPYG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FEM and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FEM vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEM
SPYG
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
FEM
SPYG
Industrials
FEM
SPYG
Energy
FEM
SPYG
Basic Materials
FEM
SPYG
Financial Services
FEM
SPYG
Utilities
FEM
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
FEM
SPYG
Communication Services
FEM
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
FEM
SPYG
Healthcare
FEM
SPYG
Real Estate
FEM
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEM vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
FEM
SPYG
FEM vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEM | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.33 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.56 | 2.31 | +2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.81 | 9.21 | +6.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEM vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEM drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEM and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEM | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.23% | -67.63% | +21.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.31% | -13.76% | +4.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.79% | -22.14% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.72% | -32.67% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.23% | -32.67% | -13.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.28% | -3.19% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.01% | -24.28% | +9.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 3.44% | -0.76% |
Volatility
FEM vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 6.83%. This indicates that FEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEM | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.89% | 6.83% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.85% | 13.72% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.54% | 17.11% | +1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 21.34% | -2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 20.74% | +0.27% |
FEM vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEM vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
FEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than SPYG's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEM First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund | 2.58% | 3.13% | 3.66% | 4.96% | 6.15% | 4.15% | 2.68% | 3.31% | 3.52% | 2.45% | 2.25% | 3.61% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEM and SPYG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEM has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to SPYG (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEM dropped -46.23% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.34% vs 10.00% for FEM. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 10.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEM.
FEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.60% for SPYG.
FEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. FEM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEM and 0.04% for SPYG.
FEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEM and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer