PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEM vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEM vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEM achieves a 20.65% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 11.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FEM has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 10.00%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.34% annualized return.


FEM

1D
1.04%
1M
1.06%
YTD
20.65%
6M
20.82%
1Y
42.19%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
10.00%

SPYG

1D
-0.71%
1M
0.34%
YTD
11.38%
6M
11.00%
1Y
31.61%
3Y*
26.51%
5Y*
14.78%
10Y*
18.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEM vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEM
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund
20.65%28.36%3.01%10.84%-14.24%7.40%-1.68%20.55%-15.51%41.05%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
11.38%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FEM and SPYG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.60

The correlation between FEM and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FEM vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEM
SPYG

Technology

28.4%
52.1%

Industrials

19.8%
5.4%

Energy

12.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

7.8%
0.3%

Financial Services

6.4%
9.0%

Utilities

6.1%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
8.5%

Communication Services

4.6%
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
1.0%

Healthcare

2.8%
5.9%

Real Estate

2.6%
0.6%

Technology

FEM
28.4%
SPYG
52.1%

Industrials

FEM
19.8%
SPYG
5.4%

Energy

FEM
12.9%
SPYG
0.1%

Basic Materials

FEM
7.8%
SPYG
0.3%

Financial Services

FEM
6.4%
SPYG
9.0%

Utilities

FEM
6.1%
SPYG
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FEM
5.7%
SPYG
8.5%

Communication Services

FEM
4.6%
SPYG
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

FEM
2.9%
SPYG
1.0%

Healthcare

FEM
2.8%
SPYG
5.9%

Real Estate

FEM
2.6%
SPYG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEM vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEM
FEM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEM vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEMSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.33

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

2.31

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.81

9.21

+6.59

FEM vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEM and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEM vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEM drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEM and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.23%

-67.63%

+21.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-13.76%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.79%

-22.14%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.72%

-32.67%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.23%

-32.67%

-13.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

-3.19%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.01%

-24.28%

+9.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

3.44%

-0.76%

Volatility

FEM vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 6.83%. This indicates that FEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.89%

6.83%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.85%

13.72%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.54%

17.11%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.60%

21.34%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.01%

20.74%

+0.27%

FEM vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEM vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

FEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than SPYG's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEM
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund
2.58%3.13%3.66%4.96%6.15%4.15%2.68%3.31%3.52%2.45%2.25%3.61%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.60%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEM and SPYG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEM has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to SPYG (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEM dropped -46.23% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.34% vs 10.00% for FEM. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.34% return vs 10.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEM.

FEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.60% for SPYG.

FEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. FEM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEM and 0.04% for SPYG.

FEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEM and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer