PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FELC vs. IHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FELC vs. IHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) and InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FELC achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly lower than IHG's 14.98% return.


FELC

1D
-0.59%
1M
5.59%
YTD
11.23%
6M
11.57%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IHG

1D
1.45%
1M
14.96%
YTD
14.98%
6M
17.70%
1Y
39.91%
3Y*
34.74%
5Y*
19.86%
10Y*
17.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FELC vs. IHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
11.23%17.09%25.25%5.68%
IHG
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
14.98%14.53%39.13%17.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FELC and IHG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FELC vs. IHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FELC
FELC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IHG
IHG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FELC vs. IHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) and InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FELCIHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.26

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

3.08

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.66

9.17

+5.50

FELC vs. IHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FELC Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the IHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FELC and IHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FELCIHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

1.56

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

0.64

+0.95

Drawdowns

FELC vs. IHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FELC drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum IHG drawdown of -77.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELC and IHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FELCIHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-77.84%

+59.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.09%

-13.04%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

0.00%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-13.87%

+11.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

4.36%

-2.41%

Volatility

FELC vs. IHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) is 2.78%, while InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that FELC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FELCIHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

6.77%

-3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.93%

19.18%

-10.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.90%

25.80%

-13.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.17%

26.84%

-11.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

30.53%

-15.36%

Dividends

FELC vs. IHG - Dividend Comparison

FELC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than IHG's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
0.85%0.92%1.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IHG
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
1.15%1.23%1.26%1.57%2.22%0.00%0.00%5.52%1.97%8.04%30.47%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FELC and IHG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHG has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to FELC (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELC dropped -18.59% vs IHG's -77.84%.

FELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FELC and IHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer