FEDM vs. DIVI
FEDM (FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund) and DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. FEDM is passively managed, while DIVI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FEDM returned 14.54%/yr vs 18.67%/yr for DIVI. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEDM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DIVI.
Performance
FEDM vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEDM achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly lower than DIVI's 11.66% return.
FEDM
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 8.83%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 11.66%
- 6M
- 14.03%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
FEDM vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 6.95% | 26.85% | 2.85% | 17.39% | -15.25% | 1.87% |
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 11.66% | 34.86% | 1.77% | 18.97% | -1.21% | 3.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEDM and DIVI is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FEDM and DIVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEDM vs. DIVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEDM
DIVI
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
FEDM
DIVI
Industrials
FEDM
DIVI
Technology
FEDM
DIVI
Healthcare
FEDM
DIVI
Consumer Defensive
FEDM
DIVI
Basic Materials
FEDM
DIVI
Energy
FEDM
DIVI
Consumer Cyclical
FEDM
DIVI
Communication Services
FEDM
DIVI
Utilities
FEDM
DIVI
Real Estate
FEDM
DIVI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEDM vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank
FEDM
DIVI
FEDM vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEDM | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 2.60 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.07 | 10.01 | -4.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEDM | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 1.85 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.67 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
FEDM vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEDM drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, which is greater than DIVI's maximum drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEDM and DIVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEDM | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.37% | -27.76% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.92% | -10.54% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.24% | -14.58% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -0.32% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -3.63% | -3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 2.73% | +0.57% |
Volatility
FEDM vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) is 4.71%, while Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that FEDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEDM | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 5.01% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.47% | 12.19% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.14% | 14.83% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 15.29% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 16.46% | 0.00% |
FEDM vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVI's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FEDM vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison
FEDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than DIVI's 3.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 3.51% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FEDM FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund | 2.80% | 2.97% | 2.94% | 2.61% | 2.53% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEDM and DIVI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVI has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to FEDM (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEDM dropped -29.37% vs DIVI's -27.76%.
On 3-year performance, DIVI leads with 18.67% vs 14.54% for FEDM. On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FEDM has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DIVI has performed better with a 18.67% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for FEDM.
DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 2.80% for FEDM.
They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for FEDM and 0.09% for DIVI.
DIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEDM and DIVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer