PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FE vs. GLAD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FEGLAD
YTD Return16.23%28.60%
1Y Return15.73%37.35%
3Y Return (Ann)5.39%12.12%
5Y Return (Ann)1.37%13.32%
10Y Return (Ann)5.50%13.34%
Sharpe Ratio1.052.21
Sortino Ratio1.592.71
Omega Ratio1.191.40
Calmar Ratio0.803.18
Martin Ratio5.258.75
Ulcer Index3.11%4.33%
Daily Std Dev15.58%17.12%
Max Drawdown-55.75%-74.88%
Current Drawdown-7.38%-0.47%

Fundamentals


FEGLAD
Market Cap$23.92B$553.43M
EPS$1.55$3.54
PE Ratio26.777.19
PEG Ratio2.052.31
Total Revenue (TTM)$13.44B$79.76M
Gross Profit (TTM)$6.26B$64.21M
EBITDA (TTM)$3.80B$74.92M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between FE and GLAD is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FE vs. GLAD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FE achieves a 16.23% return, which is significantly lower than GLAD's 28.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FE has underperformed GLAD with an annualized return of 5.50%, while GLAD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.34% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.61%
19.88%
FE
GLAD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FE vs. GLAD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FirstEnergy Corp. (FE) and Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FE, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.05
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FE, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.59
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FE, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FE, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.80
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FE, currently valued at 5.25, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.25
GLAD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLAD, currently valued at 2.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLAD, currently valued at 2.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.71
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLAD, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLAD, currently valued at 3.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLAD, currently valued at 8.75, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.008.75

FE vs. GLAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FE Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the GLAD Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FE and GLAD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.05
2.21
FE
GLAD

Dividends

FE vs. GLAD - Dividend Comparison

FE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than GLAD's 7.75% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FE
FirstEnergy Corp.
4.13%4.31%3.72%3.75%5.10%3.13%3.83%4.70%4.65%4.54%3.69%6.67%
GLAD
Gladstone Capital Corporation
7.75%9.16%8.42%6.73%8.97%8.46%11.51%9.12%8.95%11.49%10.16%8.78%

Drawdowns

FE vs. GLAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FE drawdown since its inception was -55.75%, smaller than the maximum GLAD drawdown of -74.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FE and GLAD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-7.38%
-0.47%
FE
GLAD

Volatility

FE vs. GLAD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FirstEnergy Corp. (FE) is 3.85%, while Gladstone Capital Corporation (GLAD) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that FE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.85%
4.76%
FE
GLAD

Financials

FE vs. GLAD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FirstEnergy Corp. and Gladstone Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items