FDVIX vs. PRMSX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDVIX (Fidelity Advisor Diversified International Fund Class I) and PRMSX (T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund) are both mutual funds - FDVIX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while PRMSX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, FDVIX returned 10.61%/yr vs 8.65%/yr for PRMSX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDVIX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for PRMSX.

Performance

FDVIX vs. PRMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Diversified International Fund Class I (FDVIX) and T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDVIX achieves a 15.10% return, which is significantly lower than PRMSX's 33.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FDVIX has outperformed PRMSX with an annualized return of 10.61%, while PRMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.65% annualized return.

FDVIX

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 5.31%
• YTD: 15.10%
• 6M: 14.97%
• 1Y: 27.34%
• 3Y*: 18.21%
• 5Y*: 8.22%
• 10Y*: 10.61%

PRMSX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 9.50%
• YTD: 33.65%
• 6M: 35.65%
• 1Y: 65.19%
• 3Y*: 19.90%
• 5Y*: 3.56%
• 10Y*: 8.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDVIX vs. PRMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDVIX Fidelity Advisor Diversified International Fund Class I	15.10%	27.55%	6.42%	17.36%	-23.70%	12.95%	19.60%	29.83%	-15.35%	25.62%
PRMSX T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund	33.65%	32.46%	-1.72%	2.08%	-23.35%	-10.47%	17.63%	26.51%	-16.20%	42.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FDVIX and PRMSX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1998	0.75

The correlation between FDVIX and PRMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDVIX vs. PRMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDVIX

FDVIX Risk / Return Rank: 37
FDVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FDVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FDVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FDVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FDVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

PRMSX

PRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 90
PRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
PRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDVIX vs. PRMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Diversified International Fund Class I (FDVIX) and T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDVIX	PRMSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	3.04	-1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	3.62	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.57	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	4.81	-2.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.76	18.52	-9.76

FDVIX vs. PRMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDVIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the PRMSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDVIX and PRMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDVIX vs. PRMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDVIX drawdown since its inception was -61.22%, smaller than the maximum PRMSX drawdown of -71.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDVIX and PRMSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDVIX	PRMSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.22%	-71.13%	+9.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.54%	-13.56%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.65%	-16.47%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.28%	-42.75%	+7.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.28%	-46.28%	+11.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.29%	-21.08%	+7.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	3.52%	-0.30%

Volatility

FDVIX vs. PRMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Diversified International Fund Class I (FDVIX) is 6.64%, while T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that FDVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDVIX	PRMSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.64%	11.64%	-5.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.38%	19.29%	-3.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.85%	21.53%	-3.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.34%	18.47%	-1.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.13%	18.82%	-1.69%

FDVIX vs. PRMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDVIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than PRMSX's 1.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDVIX vs. PRMSX - Dividend Comparison

FDVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.02%, more than PRMSX's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDVIX Fidelity Advisor Diversified International Fund Class I	12.02%	13.83%	6.36%	4.22%	2.17%	10.74%	0.02%	1.48%	5.04%	0.29%	1.54%	0.92%
PRMSX T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund	0.43%	0.57%	0.35%	1.09%	1.17%	8.26%	0.49%	1.24%	0.61%	0.18%	0.69%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDVIX and PRMSX in my portfolio?

FDVIX and PRMSX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDVIX or PRMSX?

PRMSX has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to FDVIX (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDVIX dropped -61.22% vs PRMSX's -71.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.