FDV vs. SPLV
FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) and SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated, while SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. FDV is actively managed, while SPLV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDV returned 14.78%/yr vs 7.54%/yr for SPLV. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLV.
Performance
FDV vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDV achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly higher than SPLV's 1.32% return.
FDV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 19.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPLV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- -0.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
FDV vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 11.72% | 11.01% | 14.41% | -2.16% | 1.92% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 1.32% | 4.10% | 13.93% | 0.53% | 2.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDV and SPLV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FDV and SPLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDV vs. SPLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDV
SPLV
Utilities
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
FDV
SPLV
Financial Services
FDV
SPLV
Healthcare
FDV
SPLV
Consumer Defensive
FDV
SPLV
Technology
FDV
SPLV
Energy
FDV
SPLV
Real Estate
FDV
SPLV
Consumer Cyclical
FDV
SPLV
Industrials
FDV
SPLV
Communication Services
FDV
SPLV
Basic Materials
FDV
SPLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDV vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank
FDV
SPLV
FDV vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDV | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.01 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | -0.00 | +3.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | -0.01 | +12.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDV | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | -0.00 | +2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.68 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
FDV vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDV drawdown since its inception was -16.70%, smaller than the maximum SPLV drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDV and SPLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDV | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.70% | -36.26% | +19.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -7.41% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.55% | -9.64% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -6.91% | +6.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -3.55% | -0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 3.05% | -1.26% |
Volatility
FDV vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) is 2.82%, while Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that FDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDV | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 2.97% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.82% | 6.78% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 9.78% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 12.45% | +0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 15.36% | -2.71% |
FDV vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDV vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison
FDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than SPLV's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 2.56% | 3.11% | 3.12% | 3.54% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.22% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDV and SPLV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPLV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to FDV (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDV dropped -16.70% vs SPLV's -36.26%.
On 3-year performance, FDV leads with 14.78% vs 7.54% for SPLV. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FDV has performed better with a 14.78% return vs 7.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDV.
FDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 2.22% for SPLV.
FDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPLV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Federated and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDV and 0.25% for SPLV.
FDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDV and SPLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer