PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTX vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDTX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDTX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FDTX
Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF
-9.38%15.25%23.99%11.73%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
6.46%49.17%39.10%16.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTX achieves a -9.38% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 6.46% return.


FDTX

1D
5.61%
1M
-4.64%
YTD
-9.38%
6M
-8.97%
1Y
17.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMH

1D
5.76%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
6.46%
6M
17.84%
1Y
81.87%
3Y*
43.47%
5Y*
25.59%
10Y*
31.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDTX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FDTX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTX
FDTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDTXSMHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

2.23

-1.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

2.85

-1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.40

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

5.10

-4.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.67

18.29

-15.62

FDTX vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTX and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDTXSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

2.23

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.28

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between FDTX and SMH is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FDTX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

FDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SMH's 0.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTX
Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF
0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.29%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Drawdowns

FDTX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTX drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTX and SMH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTXSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.23%

-84.96%

+57.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.38%

-15.95%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.85%

-10.03%

-4.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-41.36%

+35.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.12%

4.44%

+1.68%

Volatility

FDTX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) is 10.07%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 12.11%. This indicates that FDTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDTXSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.07%

12.11%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.64%

23.95%

-5.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.08%

36.84%

-8.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.22%

34.71%

-9.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.22%

32.28%

-7.06%