FDTX vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FDTX (Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDTX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. FDTX is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDTX returned 32.13%/yr vs 66.26%/yr for SMH. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDTX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

FDTX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTX achieves a 42.73% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 85.74% return.

FDTX

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 14.31%
• YTD: 42.73%
• 6M: 41.95%
• 1Y: 58.02%
• 3Y*: 32.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMH

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 16.07%
• YTD: 85.74%
• 6M: 85.96%
• 1Y: 157.81%
• 3Y*: 66.26%
• 5Y*: 40.65%
• 10Y*: 38.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FDTX Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF	42.73%	15.25%	23.99%	13.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	85.74%	49.17%	39.10%	19.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTX and SMH is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2023	0.84

The correlation between FDTX and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDTX vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDTX	SMH
Technology	86.4%	100.0%
Communication Services	7.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.6%	-
Industrials	0.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FDTX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTX

FDTX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDTX	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	4.66	-2.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	4.60	-1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.66	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	10.63	-7.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.32	38.91	-29.59

FDTX vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTX and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDTX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTX drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTX and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDTX	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.23%	-84.96%	+57.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.38%	-14.93%	-4.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.23%	-35.74%	+8.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	0.00%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.50%	-41.01%	+35.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.25%	4.07%	+2.18%

Volatility

FDTX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF (FDTX) is 14.21%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 17.29%. This indicates that FDTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDTX	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.21%	17.29%	-3.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.65%	28.18%	-5.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.11%	34.14%	-7.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.27%	35.68%	-9.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.27%	32.95%	-6.68%

FDTX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDTX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

FDTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDTX Fidelity Disruptive Technology ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.17%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDTX and SMH in my portfolio?

FDTX and SMH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDTX or SMH?

SMH has higher volatility (17.29%) compared to FDTX (14.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTX dropped -27.23% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which ETF is better, FDTX or SMH?

On 3-year performance, SMH leads with 66.26% vs 32.13% for FDTX. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FDTX has been the lower-risk option at 14.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDTX or SMH?

Over the 3-year period, SMH has performed better with a 66.26% return vs 32.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDTX or SMH?

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDTX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDTX or SMH?

SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for FDTX.

What is the main difference between FDTX and SMH?

FDTX is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDTX and 0.35% for SMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.66 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.