PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTKX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDTKX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2025 Fund Class K6 (FDTKX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FDTKX having a 8.88% return and ^GSPC slightly higher at 9.16%.


FDTKX

1D
0.97%
1M
2.28%
YTD
8.88%
6M
8.94%
1Y
20.04%
3Y*
13.16%
5Y*
6.39%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
9.16%
6M
8.64%
1Y
25.22%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
13.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTKX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2025 Fund Class K6
8.88%16.75%8.47%14.44%-16.54%10.35%14.76%19.72%-5.76%5.95%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.16%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%9.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTKX and ^GSPC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.88

The correlation between FDTKX and ^GSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTKX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTKX
FDTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FDTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTKX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2025 Fund Class K6 (FDTKX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDTKX^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

2.78

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.48

12.44

+1.04

FDTKX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTKX and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDTKX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTKX drawdown since its inception was -23.54%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTKX and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTKX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.54%

-56.78%

+33.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.32%

-9.10%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.86%

-18.90%

+10.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.54%

-25.43%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.80%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-10.71%

+6.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

2.03%

-0.55%

Volatility

FDTKX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2025 Fund Class K6 (FDTKX) is 3.68%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that FDTKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTKX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

4.67%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.34%

9.84%

-2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.62%

12.50%

-3.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.06%

16.99%

-6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.38%

18.11%

-7.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDTKX and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^GSPC has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to FDTKX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTKX dropped -23.54% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

FDTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTKX and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer