PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDSVX vs. SWLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDSVX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDSVX achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's -0.51% return.


FDSVX

1D
2.83%
1M
-3.45%
6M
5.08%
YTD
6.17%
1Y
13.57%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
17.69%
ALL TIME*
10.74%

SWLGX

1D
2.95%
1M
-3.22%
6M
1.04%
YTD
-0.51%
1Y
9.24%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FDSVX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDSVX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund
6.17%15.14%30.19%35.63%-24.43%22.93%43.43%33.77%-0.33%-0.82%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
-0.51%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%38.43%36.30%-1.59%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FDSVX and SWLGX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017

0.97

The correlation between FDSVX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDSVX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDSVX
FDSVX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FDSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDSVX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDSVXSWLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.08

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

0.45

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

1.35

+1.49

FDSVX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDSVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDSVX and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDSVX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDSVX drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDSVX and SWLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDSVXSWLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.34%

-32.69%

-26.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-16.16%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

-23.30%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.83%

-32.69%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.04%

-8.74%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.56%

-7.03%

-5.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

5.37%

-1.51%

Volatility

FDSVX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund (FDSVX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) have volatilities of 6.50% and 6.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDSVXSWLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

6.40%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.39%

14.03%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.79%

17.49%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

21.80%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.75%

22.68%

-1.93%

FDSVX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDSVX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDSVX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

FDSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than SWLGX's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDSVX
Fidelity Growth Discovery Fund
1.49%1.58%12.81%2.55%3.65%13.46%9.63%4.28%5.02%4.87%0.09%0.17%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.46%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FDSVX and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDSVX has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to SWLGX (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDSVX dropped -59.34% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

FDSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDSVX and SWLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer