FDNI vs. SMH
FDNI (First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDNI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones International Internet Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDNI returned -11.29%/yr vs 38.18%/yr for SMH. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDNI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
FDNI vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDNI achieves a -25.93% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return.
FDNI
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- -7.71%
- YTD
- -25.93%
- 6M
- -26.55%
- 1Y
- -23.20%
- 3Y*
- 4.77%
- 5Y*
- -11.29%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 72.73%
- 6M
- 71.29%
- 1Y
- 138.23%
- 3Y*
- 62.28%
- 5Y*
- 38.18%
- 10Y*
- 37.85%
FDNI vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF | -25.93% | 25.64% | 22.46% | 1.78% | -38.38% | -20.59% | 85.27% | 38.38% | -8.39% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.73% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -7.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDNI and SMH is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018 | 0.52 |
The correlation between FDNI and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDNI vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDNI
SMH
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDNI
SMH
-
Communication Services
FDNI
SMH
-
Technology
FDNI
SMH
Financial Services
FDNI
SMH
-
Real Estate
FDNI
SMH
-
Healthcare
FDNI
SMH
-
Basic Materials
FDNI
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
FDNI
-
SMH
-
Energy
FDNI
-
SMH
-
Industrials
FDNI
-
SMH
-
Utilities
FDNI
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDNI vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
FDNI
SMH
FDNI vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF (FDNI) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDNI | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.58 | -0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 9.31 | -9.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 33.88 | -35.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDNI vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDNI drawdown since its inception was -71.08%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDNI and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDNI | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.08% | -84.96% | +13.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.22% | -14.93% | -21.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.22% | -35.74% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.86% | -45.30% | -20.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.18% | -7.01% | -47.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.65% | -41.01% | +6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.78% | 4.10% | +14.68% |
Volatility
FDNI vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF (FDNI) is 7.77%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that FDNI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDNI | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 19.08% | -11.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.38% | 29.18% | -9.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.32% | 34.87% | -10.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.70% | 35.83% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.51% | 32.97% | +1.54% |
FDNI vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDNI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDNI vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
FDNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF | 1.51% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDNI and SMH have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to FDNI (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDNI dropped -71.08% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 38.18% vs -11.29% for FDNI. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FDNI has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 38.18% return vs -11.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FDNI.
FDNI has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
FDNI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. FDNI tracks Dow Jones International Internet Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FDNI and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDNI and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer