FDMO vs. RGAGX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FDMO (Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF) and RGAGX (American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6) are both funds - FDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index, while RGAGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Funds. FDMO is passively managed, while RGAGX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDMO returned 14.22%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for RGAGX. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FDMO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RGAGX.

Performance

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than RGAGX's 5.80% return.

FDMO

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -1.50%
• 6M: 8.79%
• YTD: 11.50%
• 1Y: 22.87%
• 3Y*: 25.49%
• 5Y*: 14.22%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.38%

RGAGX

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: -2.09%
• 6M: 4.88%
• YTD: 5.80%
• 1Y: 14.55%
• 3Y*: 20.65%
• 5Y*: 10.71%
• 10Y*: 15.66%
• ALL TIME*: 15.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	$8.23M	$8.36M	$6.07M
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	11.50%	21.43%	32.78%	24.79%	-19.32%	22.23%	21.71%	25.29%	-4.13%	23.93%
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6	5.80%	20.08%	28.41%	37.66%	-30.53%	19.67%	38.30%	29.22%	-2.88%	26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMO and RGAGX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016	0.92

The correlation between FDMO and RGAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDMO vs. RGAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDMO

FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 49
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

RGAGX

RGAGX Risk / Return Rank: 19
RGAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
RGAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
RGAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
RGAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
RGAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDMO	RGAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	0.75	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	1.12	+0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.14	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	0.93	+0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	3.36	+3.24

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the RGAGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMO and RGAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum RGAGX drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and RGAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDMO	RGAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.94%	-36.19%	+2.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.22%	-13.71%	+1.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.88%	-21.54%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.44%	-36.19%	+10.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.32%	-4.34%	-0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-5.47%	+0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	3.78%	-0.30%

Volatility

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) at 5.01%. This indicates that FDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDMO	RGAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.48%	5.01%	+1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.86%	13.69%	+2.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.18%	16.93%	+2.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.46%	20.52%	-1.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.63%	19.77%	-0.14%

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RGAGX's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Dividend Comparison

FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than RGAGX's 10.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF	0.61%	0.61%	0.90%	0.87%	1.19%	0.60%	0.77%	1.23%	1.22%	1.09%	0.45%	0.00%
RGAGX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6	10.39%	10.99%	9.29%	7.70%	4.44%	8.49%	4.57%	7.93%	12.36%	7.34%	6.95%	9.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDMO and RGAGX in my portfolio?

FDMO and RGAGX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDMO or RGAGX?

FDMO has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to RGAGX (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs RGAGX's -36.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.