PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDMO vs. RGAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly higher than RGAGX's 10.24% return.


FDMO

1D
-0.32%
1M
7.12%
YTD
15.24%
6M
14.87%
1Y
32.96%
3Y*
28.59%
5Y*
16.35%
10Y*

RGAGX

1D
-0.33%
1M
6.84%
YTD
10.24%
6M
9.86%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
25.54%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
16.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
15.24%21.43%32.78%24.79%-19.32%22.23%21.71%25.29%-4.13%23.93%
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
10.24%20.08%28.41%37.66%-30.53%19.67%38.30%29.22%-2.88%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMO and RGAGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.92

The correlation between FDMO and RGAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDMO vs. RGAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMO
FDMO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

RGAGX
RGAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
RGAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RGAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDMORGAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

1.99

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

7.76

+3.03

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the RGAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMO and RGAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDMORGAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.80

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.64

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.86

-0.04

Drawdowns

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum RGAGX drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and RGAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMORGAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-36.19%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-13.71%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

-21.54%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.44%

-36.19%

+10.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.33%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-5.49%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.50%

-0.44%

Volatility

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) at 3.69%. This indicates that FDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMORGAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

3.69%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

11.65%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

15.15%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

20.25%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

19.69%

-0.18%

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RGAGX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDMO vs. RGAGX - Dividend Comparison

FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than RGAGX's 9.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
0.56%0.61%0.90%0.87%1.19%0.60%0.77%1.23%1.22%1.09%0.45%0.00%
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
9.97%10.99%9.29%7.70%4.44%8.49%4.57%7.93%12.36%7.34%6.95%9.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FDMO and RGAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDMO has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to RGAGX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMO dropped -33.94% vs RGAGX's -36.19%.

FDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDMO and RGAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer