FDMO vs. ILCG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG).
FDMO and ILCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDMO is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity U.S. Momentum Factor Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. ILCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. Both FDMO and ILCG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FDMO or ILCG.
Correlation
The correlation between FDMO and ILCG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FDMO vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FDMO:
2.04
ILCG:
1.67
FDMO:
2.72
ILCG:
2.22
FDMO:
1.36
ILCG:
1.30
FDMO:
3.26
ILCG:
2.36
FDMO:
12.68
ILCG:
9.15
FDMO:
2.63%
ILCG:
3.30%
FDMO:
16.35%
ILCG:
18.11%
FDMO:
-33.94%
ILCG:
-52.98%
FDMO:
0.00%
ILCG:
-0.76%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDMO achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly higher than ILCG's 4.36% return.
FDMO
6.72%
4.33%
16.96%
30.93%
14.56%
N/A
ILCG
4.36%
2.96%
15.45%
28.25%
15.67%
15.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDMO vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDMO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FDMO vs. ILCG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FDMO
ILCG
FDMO vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FDMO vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison
FDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than ILCG's 0.47% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF | 0.84% | 0.90% | 0.87% | 1.19% | 0.60% | 0.77% | 1.23% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.87% |
Drawdowns
FDMO vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDMO drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMO and ILCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FDMO vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF (FDMO) is 4.69%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that FDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.