FDMLX vs. USNQX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FDMLX (Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund) and USNQX (USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FDMLX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while USNQX is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, FDMLX returned 13.17%/yr vs 21.76%/yr for USNQX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDMLX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for USNQX.

Performance

FDMLX vs. USNQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDMLX achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly lower than USNQX's 16.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FDMLX has underperformed USNQX with an annualized return of 13.17%, while USNQX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.76% annualized return.

FDMLX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 4.02%
• YTD: 11.85%
• 6M: 10.40%
• 1Y: 22.12%
• 3Y*: 17.08%
• 5Y*: 10.58%
• 10Y*: 13.17%

USNQX

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: -0.40%
• YTD: 16.40%
• 6M: 14.56%
• 1Y: 32.59%
• 3Y*: 25.83%
• 5Y*: 15.75%
• 10Y*: 21.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDMLX vs. USNQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDMLX Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund	11.85%	11.64%	10.76%	19.77%	-3.24%	27.54%	11.45%	17.72%	-7.17%	24.39%
USNQX USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund	16.40%	20.52%	25.42%	54.46%	-32.71%	26.82%	48.31%	38.86%	-0.43%	32.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FDMLX and USNQX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2012	0.65

The correlation between FDMLX and USNQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FDMLX vs. USNQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDMLX

FDMLX Risk / Return Rank: 42
FDMLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FDMLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FDMLX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FDMLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FDMLX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

USNQX

USNQX Risk / Return Rank: 52
USNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
USNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
USNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
USNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
USNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDMLX vs. USNQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) and USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDMLX	USNQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.93	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.54	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.34	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	2.88	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.32	10.66	-2.34

FDMLX vs. USNQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDMLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the USNQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDMLX and USNQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDMLX vs. USNQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDMLX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, smaller than the maximum USNQX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDMLX and USNQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDMLX	USNQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.03%	-76.24%	+41.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.19%	-12.07%	+2.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.52%	-22.88%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.52%	-36.95%	+13.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.03%	-36.95%	+1.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-4.23%	+3.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-26.70%	+22.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	3.26%	-0.44%

Volatility

FDMLX vs. USNQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund (FDMLX) is 3.46%, while USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that FDMLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USNQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDMLX	USNQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	9.09%	-5.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.84%	14.57%	-4.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.36%	18.05%	-3.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.88%	23.19%	-1.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.17%	22.78%	-3.61%

FDMLX vs. USNQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDMLX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than USNQX's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDMLX vs. USNQX - Dividend Comparison

FDMLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, more than USNQX's 2.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDMLX Fidelity Series Intrinsic Opportunities Fund	10.40%	11.63%	12.75%	24.60%	65.08%	18.63%	4.18%	4.94%	9.28%	4.53%	1.51%	5.76%
USNQX USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund	2.59%	3.01%	2.19%	2.60%	4.13%	4.48%	1.53%	0.88%	0.69%	1.97%	0.50%	2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDMLX and USNQX in my portfolio?

FDMLX and USNQX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDMLX or USNQX?

USNQX has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to FDMLX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDMLX dropped -35.03% vs USNQX's -76.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USNQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.