PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDM vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDM vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDM achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FDM has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 11.77%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.11% annualized return.


FDM

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.12%
6M
9.59%
YTD
15.65%
1Y
34.43%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*
11.77%
ALL TIME*
8.82%

IVV

1D
0.69%
1M
0.25%
6M
8.53%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
21.55%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
15.11%
ALL TIME*
8.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$791.30K$957.71K$769.46K
$3.36B$3.31B$5.91B

FDM vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
15.65%18.64%13.00%12.76%-11.61%35.08%-4.04%27.45%-13.53%8.72%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.13%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FDM and IVV is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2005

0.75

The correlation between FDM and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDM vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDM
IVV

Financial Services

43.4%
12.5%

Industrials

14.3%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
8.9%

Healthcare

6.6%
9.4%

Technology

6.6%
37.2%

Basic Materials

4.9%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.8%

Energy

4.4%
3.3%

Communication Services

3.2%
9.6%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.9%

Utilities

0.9%
2.6%

Financial Services

FDM
43.4%
IVV
12.5%

Industrials

FDM
14.3%
IVV
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FDM
9.8%
IVV
8.9%

Healthcare

FDM
6.6%
IVV
9.4%

Technology

FDM
6.6%
IVV
37.2%

Basic Materials

FDM
4.9%
IVV
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

FDM
4.6%
IVV
4.8%

Energy

FDM
4.4%
IVV
3.3%

Communication Services

FDM
3.2%
IVV
9.6%

Real Estate

FDM
1.3%
IVV
1.9%

Utilities

FDM
0.9%
IVV
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDM vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDM
FDM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDM vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDMIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

2.21

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.43

9.43

+1.01

FDM vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDM and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDM vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDM drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDM and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDMIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-55.25%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-8.89%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.47%

-18.75%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

-24.53%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.76%

-33.90%

-13.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-1.41%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-10.72%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.09%

+0.86%

Volatility

FDM vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 3.52%. This indicates that FDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDMIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

3.52%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.43%

10.18%

+2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.49%

12.89%

+5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

17.01%

+4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.33%

18.06%

+5.27%

FDM vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDM vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

FDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than IVV's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDM
First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund
1.37%1.43%1.56%1.81%1.80%1.08%1.68%1.37%1.26%0.97%1.13%1.45%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.09%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDM and IVV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDM has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to IVV (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDM dropped -63.45% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.11% vs 11.77% for FDM. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FDM.

FDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.

FDM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. FDM tracks Dow Jones Select Microcap Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FDM and 0.03% for IVV.

FDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDM and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer