FDLSX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FDLSX (Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FDLSX is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FDLSX returned 11.26%/yr vs 22.23%/yr for FBGRX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDLSX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLSX achieves a -2.38% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 19.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FDLSX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 11.26%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.23% annualized return.

FDLSX

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 7.95%
• YTD: -2.38%
• 6M: -14.72%
• 1Y: -13.58%
• 3Y*: 6.91%
• 5Y*: 6.35%
• 10Y*: 11.26%

FBGRX

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: 4.78%
• YTD: 19.05%
• 6M: 18.64%
• 1Y: 44.33%
• 3Y*: 31.24%
• 5Y*: 16.32%
• 10Y*: 22.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio	-2.38%	-5.30%	20.17%	30.14%	-15.27%	21.66%	18.59%	28.78%	-7.65%	29.09%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	19.05%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLSX and FBGRX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1987	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between FDLSX and FBGRX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FDLSX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLSX

FDLSX Risk / Return Rank: 1
FDLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FDLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDLSX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.62	2.34	-2.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.71	3.03	-3.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.40	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.47	3.46	-3.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.81	14.31	-15.12

FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLSX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLSX drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLSX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDLSX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.58%	-58.64%	+7.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.33%	-12.65%	-15.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.33%	-27.07%	-1.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.33%	-43.08%	+14.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.44%	-43.08%	-5.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.00%	-0.34%	-19.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.95%	-12.52%	+3.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.45%	3.06%	+13.39%

Volatility

FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) is 5.76%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that FDLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDLSX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.76%	7.86%	-2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.73%	14.72%	+4.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.61%	18.71%	+2.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.58%	25.07%	-3.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.38%	23.78%	-1.40%

FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FDLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, more than FBGRX's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.60%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio	5.29%	9.12%	7.41%	1.64%	3.32%	22.77%	2.36%	6.43%	19.76%	6.33%	1.01%	5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDLSX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

FDLSX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDLSX or FBGRX?

FBGRX has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to FDLSX (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLSX dropped -51.58% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.