FDLSX vs. FBGRX
FDLSX (Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FDLSX is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FDLSX returned 11.25%/yr vs 20.56%/yr for FBGRX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FDLSX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.
Performance
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDLSX achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 10.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FDLSX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 11.25%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.56% annualized return.
FDLSX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- -13.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.05%
FBGRX
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- 6M
- 10.25%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 1Y
- 24.18%
- 3Y*
- 25.20%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio | 0.65% | -5.30% | 20.17% | 30.14% | -15.27% | 21.66% | 18.59% | 28.78% | -7.65% | 29.09% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 10.15% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | 1.02% | 36.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDLSX and FBGRX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1987 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDLSX and FBGRX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDLSX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FDLSX
FBGRX
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDLSX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.19 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 1.73 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 6.19 | -7.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLSX drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLSX and FBGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDLSX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.58% | -58.64% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.94% | -12.65% | -15.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.33% | -27.07% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.33% | -43.08% | +14.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.44% | -43.08% | -5.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.51% | -7.79% | -9.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -12.49% | +3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.32% | 3.54% | +13.78% |
Volatility
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) is 5.69%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that FDLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDLSX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 6.56% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.67% | 16.09% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.12% | 20.05% | +2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.61% | 25.24% | -3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 23.83% | -1.45% |
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FDLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than FBGRX's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 1.72% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio | 5.13% | 9.12% | 7.41% | 1.64% | 3.32% | 22.77% | 2.36% | 6.43% | 19.76% | 6.33% | 1.01% | 5.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDLSX and FBGRX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBGRX has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to FDLSX (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLSX dropped -51.58% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.
FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDLSX and FBGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer