FDLSX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
FDLSX is managed by Fidelity Investments. It was launched on May 7, 1984. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FDLSX or FBGRX.
Key characteristics
| FDLSX | FBGRX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.26% | 17.83% |
| 1Y Return | 17.60% | 28.49% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.62% | 5.26% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.20% | 19.89% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.28% | 16.58% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.27 | 1.42 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.19% | 20.53% |
| Max Drawdown | -94.48% | -57.42% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.07% | -10.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDLSX and FBGRX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FDLSX achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 17.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FDLSX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 12.28%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.58% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FDLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than FBGRX's 0.27% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio | 2.30% | 1.64% | 3.32% | 22.77% | 2.36% | 6.43% | 20.10% | 6.33% | 1.01% | 5.56% | 8.61% | 8.06% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 0.27% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.28% | 4.05% | 5.07% | 6.08% | 7.80% |
Drawdowns
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLSX drawdown since its inception was -94.48%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLSX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) is 4.12%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that FDLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.