FDLSX vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
FDLSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 7, 1984. FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Performance
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio | -12.27% | -5.30% | 13.64% | 30.14% | -15.27% | 21.66% | 18.59% | 28.78% | -7.65% | 29.09% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | -11.15% | 19.91% | 39.77% | 55.61% | -38.45% | 22.64% | 62.20% | 33.43% | 1.02% | 36.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDLSX achieves a -12.27% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's -11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FDLSX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 9.06%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.55% annualized return.
FDLSX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -8.57%
- YTD
- -12.27%
- 6M
- -23.33%
- 1Y
- -13.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
FBGRX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- -11.15%
- 6M
- -8.04%
- 1Y
- 22.53%
- 3Y*
- 24.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 18.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDLSX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDLSX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank
FDLSX
FBGRX
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDLSX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | 0.91 | -1.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | 1.43 | -2.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.20 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 1.36 | -1.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 5.44 | -6.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDLSX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.53 | 0.91 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.45 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.79 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.64 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDLSX and FBGRX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
FDLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.40%, more than FBGRX's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDLSX Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio | 10.40% | 9.12% | 1.57% | 1.64% | 3.32% | 22.77% | 2.36% | 6.43% | 19.76% | 6.33% | 1.01% | 5.42% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 2.14% | 1.90% | 5.95% | 0.93% | 0.57% | 8.73% | 6.40% | 3.70% | 6.32% | 4.23% | 4.05% | 5.30% |
Drawdowns
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDLSX drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLSX and FBGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDLSX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.58% | -58.64% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.33% | -13.89% | -14.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.33% | -43.08% | +14.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.44% | -43.08% | -5.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.10% | -12.65% | -15.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -12.58% | +3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.09% | 3.47% | +8.62% |
Volatility
FDLSX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Leisure Portfolio (FDLSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) have volatilities of 6.09% and 6.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDLSX | FBGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 6.13% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.83% | 13.36% | +4.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.50% | 24.63% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 24.86% | -3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.26% | 23.59% | -1.33% |