FDLS vs. INDS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDLS (Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF) and INDS (Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDLS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while INDS is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDLS returned 19.80%/yr vs 5.60%/yr for INDS. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDLS charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for INDS.

Performance

FDLS vs. INDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLS achieves a 16.11% return, which is significantly higher than INDS's 9.73% return.

FDLS

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 2.31%
• YTD: 16.11%
• 6M: 14.16%
• 1Y: 34.59%
• 3Y*: 19.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INDS

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 9.73%
• 6M: 10.02%
• 1Y: 11.96%
• 3Y*: 5.60%
• 5Y*: 1.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLS vs. INDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF	16.11%	22.47%	7.41%	20.70%	-1.68%
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF	9.73%	7.78%	-12.69%	17.72%	-13.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLS and INDS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2022	0.55

The correlation between FDLS and INDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDLS vs. INDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLS

FDLS Risk / Return Rank: 71
FDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

INDS

INDS Risk / Return Rank: 22
INDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
INDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
INDS Omega Ratio Rank: 20
INDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
INDS Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLS vs. INDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDLS	INDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	0.73	+1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	1.13	+1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.13	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	0.98	+2.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.37	2.95	+11.42

FDLS vs. INDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLS Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the INDS Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLS and INDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDLS vs. INDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLS drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, smaller than the maximum INDS drawdown of -40.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLS and INDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDLS	INDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.32%	-40.17%	+16.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.55%	-12.23%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	-26.96%	+3.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-18.17%	+17.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-15.58%	+11.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	4.06%	-1.65%

Volatility

FDLS vs. INDS - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) at 4.91%. This indicates that FDLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDLS	INDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.36%	4.91%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.85%	12.50%	+0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.06%	16.56%	+0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.07%	20.17%	-1.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.07%	23.07%	-4.00%

FDLS vs. INDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLS has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than INDS's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDLS vs. INDS - Dividend Comparison

FDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than INDS's 3.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FDLS Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF	0.85%	0.86%	7.26%	0.97%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF	3.37%	3.70%	3.75%	3.11%	2.63%	1.24%	1.68%	2.26%	1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDLS and INDS in my portfolio?

FDLS and INDS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDLS or INDS?

FDLS has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to INDS (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLS dropped -23.32% vs INDS's -40.17%.

Which ETF is better, FDLS or INDS?

On 3-year performance, FDLS leads with 19.80% vs 5.60% for INDS. On fees, INDS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, INDS has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDLS or INDS?

Over the 3-year period, FDLS has performed better with a 19.80% return vs 5.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDLS or INDS?

INDS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for FDLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDLS or INDS?

INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 0.85% for FDLS.

What is the main difference between FDLS and INDS?

FDLS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while INDS is REIT. FDLS tracks WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for FDLS and 0.60% for INDS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.