PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDLO vs. SLYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDLO vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDLO achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly lower than SLYV's 15.25% return.


FDLO

1D
-0.85%
1M
1.29%
YTD
5.00%
6M
4.24%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
14.30%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*

SLYV

1D
-1.18%
1M
2.30%
YTD
15.25%
6M
14.70%
1Y
37.01%
3Y*
14.08%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
10.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDLO vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
5.00%11.77%16.06%16.38%-10.38%24.00%12.19%31.10%-0.26%20.44%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
15.25%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%30.57%2.68%24.26%-12.77%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FDLO and SLYV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.67

The correlation between FDLO and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDLO vs. SLYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDLO
SLYV

Technology

33.1%
11.3%

Financial Services

12.5%
19.8%

Communication Services

10.8%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
15.9%

Healthcare

9.5%
7.5%

Industrials

9.1%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
3.8%

Energy

3.4%
7.6%

Utilities

2.3%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.3%
8.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
7.1%

Technology

FDLO
33.1%
SLYV
11.3%

Financial Services

FDLO
12.5%
SLYV
19.8%

Communication Services

FDLO
10.8%
SLYV
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FDLO
10.2%
SLYV
15.9%

Healthcare

FDLO
9.5%
SLYV
7.5%

Industrials

FDLO
9.1%
SLYV
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

FDLO
4.7%
SLYV
3.8%

Energy

FDLO
3.4%
SLYV
7.6%

Utilities

FDLO
2.3%
SLYV
2.2%

Real Estate

FDLO
2.3%
SLYV
8.7%

Basic Materials

FDLO
1.7%
SLYV
7.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDLO vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDLO
FDLO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FDLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDLO vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDLOSLYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

3.97

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

13.09

-3.80

FDLO vs. SLYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the SLYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDLO and SLYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDLOSLYVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

2.05

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.26

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.46

+0.37

Drawdowns

FDLO vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDLO drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, smaller than the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDLO and SLYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDLOSLYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.35%

-61.15%

+26.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-9.36%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.68%

-28.68%

+15.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-28.68%

+9.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-1.18%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-8.94%

+5.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.83%

-1.20%

Volatility

FDLO vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF (FDLO) is 1.91%, while SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that FDLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDLOSLYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

4.42%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.41%

11.46%

-5.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.75%

18.26%

-9.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.07%

21.96%

-8.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

23.96%

-8.46%

FDLO vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDLO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDLO vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison

FDLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than SLYV's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
1.36%1.37%1.40%1.35%1.49%1.11%1.38%1.55%1.76%1.61%0.55%0.00%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDLO and SLYV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLYV has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to FDLO (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDLO dropped -34.35% vs SLYV's -61.15%.

On 5-year performance, FDLO leads with 10.12% vs 5.66% for SLYV. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FDLO has been the lower-risk option at 1.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDLO has performed better with a 10.12% return vs 5.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDLO.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.36% for FDLO.

FDLO is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while SLYV is Small Cap Value Equities. FDLO tracks Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor Index, while SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDLO and 0.15% for SLYV.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDLO and SLYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer