FDIS vs. RFG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG).
FDIS and RFG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDIS is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. RFG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Growth. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. Both FDIS and RFG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FDIS or RFG.
Correlation
The correlation between FDIS and RFG is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FDIS vs. RFG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FDIS:
0.41
RFG:
-0.38
FDIS:
0.75
RFG:
-0.40
FDIS:
1.10
RFG:
0.95
FDIS:
0.38
RFG:
-0.35
FDIS:
1.21
RFG:
-1.04
FDIS:
8.55%
RFG:
9.03%
FDIS:
25.61%
RFG:
24.50%
FDIS:
-39.16%
RFG:
-51.93%
FDIS:
-18.42%
RFG:
-18.30%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -12.90% return, which is significantly lower than RFG's -9.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has outperformed RFG with an annualized return of 11.85%, while RFG has yielded a comparatively lower 5.87% annualized return.
FDIS
-12.90%
-2.99%
-3.41%
8.72%
14.45%
11.85%
RFG
-9.97%
-2.66%
-10.14%
-9.74%
11.56%
5.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDIS vs. RFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RFG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FDIS vs. RFG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FDIS
RFG
FDIS vs. RFG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FDIS vs. RFG - Dividend Comparison
FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than RFG's 0.34% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% | 1.01% |
RFG Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.99% | 0.78% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.64% | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.35% | 0.61% | 0.60% |
Drawdowns
FDIS vs. RFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum RFG drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and RFG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FDIS vs. RFG - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) have volatilities of 16.30% and 15.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.