PortfoliosLab logo
FDIG vs. GBTC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FDIG and GBTC is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential

Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer

Try portfolio optimization now

Performance

FDIG vs. GBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC) (GBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-14.83%
22.10%
FDIG
GBTC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FDIG:

-0.29

GBTC:

0.24

Sortino Ratio

FDIG:

-0.03

GBTC:

0.74

Omega Ratio

FDIG:

1.00

GBTC:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

FDIG:

-0.36

GBTC:

0.37

Martin Ratio

FDIG:

-0.86

GBTC:

0.83

Ulcer Index

FDIG:

19.81%

GBTC:

15.87%

Daily Std Dev

FDIG:

59.65%

GBTC:

55.57%

Max Drawdown

FDIG:

-58.32%

GBTC:

-89.91%

Current Drawdown

FDIG:

-46.86%

GBTC:

-21.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIG achieves a -30.53% return, which is significantly lower than GBTC's -10.40% return.


FDIG

YTD

-30.53%

1M

-19.94%

6M

-15.98%

1Y

-14.22%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GBTC

YTD

-10.40%

1M

-3.59%

6M

33.49%

1Y

10.55%

5Y*

54.25%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FDIG vs. GBTC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDIG is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDIG is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDIG is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDIG is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDIG is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDIG is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

GBTC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GBTC is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GBTC is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GBTC is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GBTC is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GBTC is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GBTC is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FDIG vs. GBTC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC) (GBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FDIG, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00
FDIG: -0.27
GBTC: 0.02
The chart of Sortino ratio for FDIG, currently valued at -0.00, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
FDIG: -0.00
GBTC: 0.43
The chart of Omega ratio for FDIG, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
FDIG: 1.00
GBTC: 1.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for FDIG, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00
FDIG: -0.35
GBTC: 0.03
The chart of Martin ratio for FDIG, currently valued at -0.81, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00
FDIG: -0.81
GBTC: 0.06

The current FDIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the GBTC Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIG and GBTC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.27
0.02
FDIG
GBTC

Dividends

FDIG vs. GBTC - Dividend Comparison

FDIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
FDIG
Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF
1.68%1.17%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.23%

Drawdowns

FDIG vs. GBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIG drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, smaller than the maximum GBTC drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIG and GBTC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-46.86%
-27.29%
FDIG
GBTC

Volatility

FDIG vs. GBTC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC) (GBTC) have volatilities of 18.74% and 18.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
18.74%
18.80%
FDIG
GBTC

User Portfolios with FDIG or GBTC


GOOGL
AMZN
AEE
AEP
AFG
ADI
META
FR
FI
GILD
INTU
JPM
ORLY
ORCL
PAYX
PM
PG
PGR
AAPL
AMAT
ADP
AZO
BAC
BKNG
BAH
AVGO
CBOE
CI
KO
CL
CMCSA
CMPGY
DLB
EA
EXPGY
XOM
ADRNY
LHX
LDOS
LLY
LMT
LULU
MTB
MSCI
MMC
MA
MCK
MRK
MSFT
NTAP
NYT
NICE
GEN
NVDA
PSA
RGA
RELX
SHEL
SPGI
CRM
NOW
SHW
STN
TSM
TMO
UNH
VZ
VRTX
V
WMT
YUM
DOX
ETN
EG
G
MDT
QQQ
ABBV
ADBE
ACM
BIL
GLD
GBTC
DOG
-2%
YTD
SPY
FDVV
GLDM
JPIE
SCHO
GBTC
XLF
1 / 21

Recent discussions

Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio

Do the screens just pick the 10 stock portfolio & has the selection been the same for awhile? Seems like a no-brainer way to go based on performance, ease, expense. Just trying to get some clarity on this lazy portfolio.

4803heights

April 05, 25 Posted in general
143

Bonds (BND and/or BNDX) are greatly favored over stocks by the optimizer

I have not seem many orange lines winning against original or benchmark no matter what I do. But the software seems to be doing something when all is stock or stock ETFs. However, Bonds and Stocks don't work well together. The moment I add BND or BNDX, the optimizer puts almost all of the weight in the bonds. I ran out of the free limit of calculations.

Maybe it's a message we all need to hear: invest in bond ETFs. Maybe I'm not using the tool correctly. Maybe there is something wrong with the tool.

I don't know.

-- Fred

Fred

December 13, 23 Posted in general
2K

Transactional Portfolio Use

I am trying to understand how to make the best use of transactional portfolios. At first I thought it is useful when tracking the performance of a self-managed fund. You add cash to it, transact in equities, adding each transaction to the portfolio. It then shows you its performance wrt. to a benchmark. The broker does this for you anyway, but the whole reason I started evaluating Portfolioslab is so that I can separate my single broker account into thematic baskets ("thematic funds") and track their performance individually.

The transactional portfolio in Portfolioslab does not seem to work that way. It does not consider the changes in cash position, ie. any profit/loss made on equity transactions. It does not seem to be suited for track the assets of a fund, so to speak. What good is transactional portfolio then?

EG

May 14, 24 Posted in general
561