PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDGRX vs. FCPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDGRX vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDGRX achieves a 23.69% return, which is significantly higher than FCPGX's 17.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FDGRX has outperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 23.01%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.72% annualized return.


FDGRX

1D
0.75%
1M
9.19%
YTD
23.69%
6M
19.33%
1Y
49.90%
3Y*
31.65%
5Y*
17.30%
10Y*
23.01%

FCPGX

1D
-1.13%
1M
3.11%
YTD
17.62%
6M
17.45%
1Y
38.80%
3Y*
20.50%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
14.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDGRX vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
23.69%18.54%37.18%47.25%-33.86%22.57%67.42%38.40%-4.14%36.76%
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
17.62%11.20%20.56%19.02%-25.34%10.50%36.41%36.31%-4.57%28.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FDGRX and FCPGX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2004

0.88

The correlation between FDGRX and FCPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (3 years) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDGRX vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGRX
FDGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FDGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FCPGX
FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDGRX vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDGRXFCPGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.81

1.88

+0.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.42

2.56

+0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.32

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

3.01

+1.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.39

12.15

+3.24

FDGRX vs. FCPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGRX and FCPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDGRXFCPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.88

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.34

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

0.65

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.53

+0.16

Drawdowns

FDGRX vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGRX drawdown since its inception was -71.62%, which is greater than FCPGX's maximum drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGRX and FCPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDGRXFCPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.62%

-59.11%

-12.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.60%

-13.12%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.19%

-28.69%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.25%

-39.04%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.25%

-39.04%

-1.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.18%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.91%

-10.70%

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.26%

+0.08%

Volatility

FDGRX vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) is 4.40%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that FDGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDGRXFCPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

6.47%

-2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.43%

16.30%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.47%

21.21%

-2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.93%

23.48%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.39%

22.84%

+0.55%

FDGRX vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDGRX vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison

FDGRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCPGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund
5.43%6.38%1.37%0.00%0.00%19.27%8.19%5.31%14.35%6.88%1.53%4.32%
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
0.00%0.00%8.86%3.83%7.20%10.67%8.86%3.84%6.38%4.73%6.16%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDGRX and FCPGX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCPGX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to FDGRX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDGRX dropped -71.62% vs FCPGX's -59.11%.

FDGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDGRX and FCPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer