FDGR vs. VT

In the year-to-date period, FDGR achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 5.86% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FDGR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Foundations Dynamic Growth ETF (FDGR) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FDGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDGR and VT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FDGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.

The maximum FDGR drawdown since its inception was -20.24%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGR and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Foundations Dynamic Growth ETF (FDGR) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 4.23%. This indicates that FDGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.