FDGR vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about Foundations Dynamic Growth ETF (FDGR) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
FDGR and SMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDGR is an actively managed fund by Foundations. It was launched on Oct 2, 2023. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FDGR or SMH.
Correlation
The correlation between FDGR and SMH is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FDGR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FDGR:
1.29
SMH:
0.68
FDGR:
1.79
SMH:
1.10
FDGR:
1.24
SMH:
1.14
FDGR:
1.78
SMH:
0.99
FDGR:
6.53
SMH:
2.29
FDGR:
3.32%
SMH:
10.76%
FDGR:
16.71%
SMH:
36.24%
FDGR:
-12.16%
SMH:
-83.29%
FDGR:
-0.77%
SMH:
-10.04%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDGR achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 4.03% return.
FDGR
3.46%
4.68%
14.08%
22.38%
N/A
N/A
SMH
4.03%
2.64%
2.71%
24.46%
28.27%
25.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDGR vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDGR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FDGR vs. SMH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FDGR
SMH
FDGR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Foundations Dynamic Growth ETF (FDGR) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FDGR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
FDGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDGR Foundations Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.43% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
FDGR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDGR drawdown since its inception was -12.16%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGR and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FDGR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Foundations Dynamic Growth ETF (FDGR) is 4.99%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that FDGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.