PortfoliosLab logo
FDGR vs. IWY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FDGR and IWY is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FDGR vs. IWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Foundations Dynamic Growth ETF (FDGR) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FDGR:

9.76%

IWY:

24.97%

Max Drawdown

FDGR:

-0.68%

IWY:

-32.68%

Current Drawdown

FDGR:

-0.08%

IWY:

-10.79%

Returns By Period


FDGR

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IWY

YTD

-7.30%

1M

6.66%

6M

-6.03%

1Y

11.69%

5Y*

18.39%

10Y*

16.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDGR vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDGR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FDGR vs. IWY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDGR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDGR is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDGR is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDGR is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDGR is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDGR is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDGR is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

IWY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWY is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWY is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWY is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWY is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWY is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWY is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FDGR vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Foundations Dynamic Growth ETF (FDGR) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

FDGR vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison

FDGR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FDGR
Foundations Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.45%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%1.44%

Drawdowns

FDGR vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDGR drawdown since its inception was -0.68%, smaller than the maximum IWY drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDGR and IWY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FDGR vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...