FDG vs. VYM
FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. FDG is actively managed, while VYM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDG returned 12.61%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for VYM. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDG charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
FDG vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDG achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return.
FDG
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 31.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- —
VYM
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
FDG vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 7.52% | 22.13% | 45.89% | 37.22% | -35.74% | 8.52% | 93.61% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.47% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 34.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDG and VYM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between FDG and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDG vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDG
VYM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
FDG
VYM
Communication Services
FDG
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
FDG
VYM
Healthcare
FDG
VYM
Industrials
FDG
VYM
Financial Services
FDG
VYM
Energy
FDG
VYM
Utilities
FDG
VYM
Basic Materials
FDG
-
VYM
Consumer Defensive
FDG
-
VYM
Real Estate
FDG
-
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDG vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
FDG
VYM
FDG vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDG | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.46 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 3.93 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | 14.76 | -7.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDG | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 2.56 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.83 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.51 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
FDG vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDG drawdown since its inception was -43.69%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDG and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDG | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.69% | -56.98% | +13.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.71% | -6.69% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.14% | -14.46% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.69% | -15.84% | -27.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.13% | -0.43% | -2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.43% | -7.19% | -6.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 1.78% | +2.67% |
Volatility
FDG vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.77%. This indicates that FDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDG | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.18% | 2.77% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 7.67% | +6.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.77% | 10.28% | +7.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 13.96% | +10.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.90% | 16.34% | +8.56% |
FDG vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDG vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDG and VYM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDG has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDG dropped -43.69% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 5-year performance, FDG leads with 12.61% vs 11.48% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDG has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 11.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDG.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.
FDG is categorized as Global Equities, while VYM is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FDG and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDG and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer