PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDFIX vs. FOCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDFIX vs. FOCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund (FOCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDFIX achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than FOCSX's 17.96% return.


FDFIX

1D
0.28%
1M
5.37%
YTD
11.29%
6M
11.56%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
22.53%
5Y*
14.07%
10Y*

FOCSX

1D
-1.13%
1M
3.12%
YTD
17.96%
6M
17.81%
1Y
39.14%
3Y*
20.96%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDFIX vs. FOCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDFIX
Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund
11.29%17.59%25.06%26.27%-18.10%28.69%18.46%31.47%-4.45%11.51%
FOCSX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund
17.96%11.33%21.04%19.62%-25.01%10.50%37.44%36.25%-4.60%16.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FDFIX and FOCSX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2017

0.83

The correlation between FDFIX and FOCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDFIX vs. FOCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDFIX
FDFIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FDFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCSX
FOCSX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FOCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDFIX vs. FOCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund (FOCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDFIXFOCSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

1.88

+0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.37

2.56

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.32

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.08

+0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.29

12.44

+2.85

FDFIX vs. FOCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the FOCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDFIX and FOCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDFIXFOCSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.88

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.36

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.60

+0.23

Drawdowns

FDFIX vs. FOCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDFIX drawdown since its inception was -33.77%, smaller than the maximum FOCSX drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDFIX and FOCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDFIXFOCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.77%

-38.79%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-12.98%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-28.51%

+9.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-38.79%

+14.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.21%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-10.96%

+6.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

3.21%

-1.24%

Volatility

FDFIX vs. FOCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) is 2.92%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund (FOCSX) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that FDFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDFIXFOCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

6.46%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

16.41%

-7.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

21.38%

-9.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

23.48%

-6.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.59%

23.58%

-4.99%

FDFIX vs. FOCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDFIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCSX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDFIX vs. FOCSX - Dividend Comparison

FDFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than FOCSX's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDFIX
Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund
1.03%1.11%1.26%1.48%1.70%1.27%1.52%1.78%2.16%0.50%
FOCSX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund
2.33%2.74%2.26%0.23%0.05%31.03%2.78%0.00%2.47%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDFIX and FOCSX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOCSX has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to FDFIX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDFIX dropped -33.77% vs FOCSX's -38.79%.

FDFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDFIX and FOCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer