PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDESX vs. FZACX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDESX vs. FZACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class O (FDESX) and Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class Z (FZACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FDESX having a 14.17% return and FZACX slightly lower at 14.11%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDESX having a 16.19% annualized return and FZACX not far behind at 16.15%.


FDESX

1D
0.32%
1M
5.14%
YTD
14.17%
6M
14.12%
1Y
31.70%
3Y*
23.47%
5Y*
13.80%
10Y*
16.19%

FZACX

1D
0.28%
1M
5.12%
YTD
14.11%
6M
14.08%
1Y
31.63%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
16.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDESX vs. FZACX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDESX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class O
14.17%14.07%28.08%28.34%-19.86%28.26%27.46%28.23%-5.62%17.76%
FZACX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class Z
14.11%14.06%28.02%28.33%-19.88%28.19%27.41%28.17%-5.57%17.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FDESX and FZACX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2013

1.00

The correlation between FDESX and FZACX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDESX vs. FZACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDESX
FDESX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FDESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDESX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FDESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDESX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FZACX
FZACX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FZACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZACX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FZACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZACX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDESX vs. FZACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class O (FDESX) and Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class Z (FZACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDESXFZACXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.30

2.29

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

3.08

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

3.27

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.47

14.42

+0.05

FDESX vs. FZACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDESX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the FZACX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDESX and FZACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDESXFZACXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.29

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.71

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.83

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.77

-0.29

Drawdowns

FDESX vs. FZACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDESX drawdown since its inception was -65.36%, which is greater than FZACX's maximum drawdown of -30.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDESX and FZACX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDESXFZACXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.36%

-30.35%

-35.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.99%

-9.99%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.06%

-26.71%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.06%

-26.71%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.39%

-30.35%

-0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.04%

-5.08%

-8.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.26%

0.00%

Volatility

FDESX vs. FZACX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class O (FDESX) and Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class Z (FZACX) have volatilities of 4.24% and 4.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDESXFZACXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

4.22%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

11.16%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.27%

14.29%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.69%

19.57%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

19.50%

+0.06%

FDESX vs. FZACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDESX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FZACX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDESX vs. FZACX - Dividend Comparison

FDESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than FZACX's 5.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDESX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class O
5.77%6.58%13.97%3.55%9.06%16.87%5.28%3.23%13.54%7.61%1.67%8.53%
FZACX
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock Fund Class Z
5.50%6.28%13.41%3.39%8.71%16.27%5.10%3.12%13.16%7.44%1.60%8.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FDESX and FZACX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDESX has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to FZACX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDESX dropped -65.36% vs FZACX's -30.35%.

FDESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDESX and FZACX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer