PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDD vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDD vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDD achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 10.84% return. Over the past 10 years, FDD has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 11.01%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.86% annualized return.


FDD

1D
0.50%
1M
7.25%
6M
13.35%
YTD
18.92%
1Y
39.43%
3Y*
27.25%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*
11.01%
ALL TIME*
2.89%

NOBL

1D
-0.19%
1M
-1.09%
6M
4.89%
YTD
10.84%
1Y
15.41%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
9.86%
ALL TIME*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.43M$2.30M$2.53M
$66.40M$66.46M$60.79M

FDD vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
18.92%62.50%0.28%14.16%-16.14%16.03%-3.80%23.79%-8.98%19.07%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
10.84%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FDD and NOBL is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between FDD and NOBL has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDD vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDD
NOBL

Financial Services

58.2%
13.2%

Industrials

11.4%
20.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
5.3%

Energy

9.1%
2.9%

Utilities

6.0%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
23.3%

Real Estate

3.3%
4.6%

Basic Materials

2.8%
9.4%

Communication Services

1.9%

-

Healthcare

-

10.8%

Technology

-

4.3%

Financial Services

FDD
58.2%
NOBL
13.2%

Industrials

FDD
11.4%
NOBL
20.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FDD
9.2%
NOBL
5.3%

Energy

FDD
9.1%
NOBL
2.9%

Utilities

FDD
6.0%
NOBL
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

FDD
4.2%
NOBL
23.3%

Real Estate

FDD
3.3%
NOBL
4.6%

Basic Materials

FDD
2.8%
NOBL
9.4%

Communication Services

FDD
1.9%
NOBL

-

Healthcare

FDD

-

NOBL
10.8%

Technology

FDD

-

NOBL
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDD vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDD
FDD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDD vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDDNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.21

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

1.62

+2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

4.10

+9.67

FDD vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDD Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDD and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDD vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDD drawdown since its inception was -74.77%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDD and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDDNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.77%

-35.43%

-39.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-9.11%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-15.36%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.84%

-17.92%

-16.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.43%

-35.43%

-6.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.31%

+2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.18%

-3.46%

-31.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

3.59%

-0.76%

Volatility

FDD vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) is 3.74%, while ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that FDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDDNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

5.07%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.14%

9.11%

+4.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

11.92%

+3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.44%

14.48%

+3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

16.63%

+3.14%

FDD vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDD has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDD vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

FDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than NOBL's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
5.01%3.99%7.65%6.85%6.07%3.44%4.01%4.69%5.05%2.78%4.88%4.35%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.04%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDD and NOBL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOBL has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to FDD (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDD dropped -74.77% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, FDD leads with 11.01% vs 9.86% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FDD has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDD has performed better with a 11.01% return vs 9.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.

FDD has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 2.04% for NOBL.

FDD is categorized as Europe Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FDD and 0.35% for NOBL.

FDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDD and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer