PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FDCE vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FDCEBDGS
YTD Return10.80%12.74%
Daily Std Dev13.12%6.58%
Max Drawdown-8.06%-5.38%
Current Drawdown-1.37%-0.15%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between FDCE and BDGS is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FDCE vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FDCE achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 12.74% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
6.10%
10.65%
FDCE
BDGS

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDCE vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDCE has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for FDCE: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FDCE vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Foundations Dynamic Core ETF (FDCE) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDCE
Sharpe ratio
No data
BDGS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 4.83, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.88
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 3.53, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BDGS, currently valued at 21.35, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0021.35

FDCE vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

FDCE vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

FDCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than BDGS's 0.74% yield.


TTM2023
FDCE
Foundations Dynamic Core ETF
0.19%0.22%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.74%0.84%

Drawdowns

FDCE vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDCE drawdown since its inception was -8.06%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDCE and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-1.37%
-0.15%
FDCE
BDGS

Volatility

FDCE vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Foundations Dynamic Core ETF (FDCE) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 0.68%. This indicates that FDCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
4.19%
0.68%
FDCE
BDGS