FCPGX vs. FSKAX

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCPGX having a 23.52% return and FSKAX slightly higher at 24.20%. Over the past 10 years, FCPGX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 7.51%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FCPGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FCPGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCPGX and FSKAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FCPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than FSKAX's 1.16% yield.

The maximum FCPGX drawdown since its inception was -59.11%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPGX and FSKAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 4.27%. This indicates that FCPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.