FCOM vs. VWO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO).
FCOM and VWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCOM is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. VWO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Emerging Index. It was launched on Mar 4, 2005. Both FCOM and VWO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FCOM or VWO.
Correlation
The correlation between FCOM and VWO is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FCOM vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FCOM:
2.06
VWO:
0.74
FCOM:
2.73
VWO:
1.13
FCOM:
1.36
VWO:
1.14
FCOM:
1.66
VWO:
0.47
FCOM:
14.35
VWO:
2.63
FCOM:
2.37%
VWO:
4.19%
FCOM:
16.51%
VWO:
14.96%
FCOM:
-46.76%
VWO:
-67.68%
FCOM:
-4.22%
VWO:
-12.15%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCOM achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's -1.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FCOM has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 10.50%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.75% annualized return.
FCOM
0.87%
-2.92%
14.69%
34.70%
10.46%
10.50%
VWO
-1.32%
-3.68%
-0.24%
13.36%
2.02%
3.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCOM vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FCOM and VWO have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FCOM vs. VWO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FCOM
VWO
FCOM vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FCOM vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
FCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than VWO's 3.24% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOM Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF | 0.86% | 0.87% | 0.77% | 1.04% | 0.90% | 0.68% | 0.86% | 2.78% | 7.54% | 2.25% | 2.92% | 2.69% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 3.24% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.24% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.86% |
Drawdowns
FCOM vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCOM drawdown since its inception was -46.76%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOM and VWO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FCOM vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 3.84%. This indicates that FCOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.