PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FCNVX vs. KO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FCNVX and KO is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.0

Performance

FCNVX vs. KO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
31.42%
192.17%
FCNVX
KO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FCNVX:

4.19

KO:

0.51

Sortino Ratio

FCNVX:

20.20

KO:

0.82

Omega Ratio

FCNVX:

6.83

KO:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

FCNVX:

71.74

KO:

0.43

Martin Ratio

FCNVX:

152.24

KO:

1.02

Ulcer Index

FCNVX:

0.05%

KO:

6.49%

Daily Std Dev

FCNVX:

1.71%

KO:

12.91%

Max Drawdown

FCNVX:

-2.19%

KO:

-68.21%

Current Drawdown

FCNVX:

-0.00%

KO:

-13.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNVX achieves a -0.00% return, which is significantly higher than KO's -0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FCNVX has underperformed KO with an annualized return of 2.50%, while KO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.36% annualized return.


FCNVX

YTD

-0.00%

1M

0.40%

6M

3.51%

1Y

7.19%

5Y*

3.40%

10Y*

2.50%

KO

YTD

-0.55%

1M

-1.04%

6M

-6.31%

1Y

7.48%

5Y*

4.71%

10Y*

7.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCNVX vs. KO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCNVX is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCNVX is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCNVX is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCNVX is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCNVX is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCNVX is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

KO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KO is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KO is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KO is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KO is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KO is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KO is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FCNVX vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCNVX, currently valued at 4.19, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.004.190.53
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCNVX, currently valued at 20.20, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0020.200.85
The chart of Omega ratio for FCNVX, currently valued at 6.83, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.006.831.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCNVX, currently valued at 71.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0071.740.44
The chart of Martin ratio for FCNVX, currently valued at 152.24, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00152.241.05
FCNVX
KO

The current FCNVX Sharpe Ratio is 4.19, which is higher than the KO Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNVX and KO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.19
0.53
FCNVX
KO

Dividends

FCNVX vs. KO - Dividend Comparison

FCNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, more than KO's 3.13% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FCNVX
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class
6.82%6.82%6.25%2.15%0.29%1.01%2.46%2.55%1.30%0.93%0.54%0.39%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
3.13%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%2.89%

Drawdowns

FCNVX vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNVX drawdown since its inception was -2.19%, smaller than the maximum KO drawdown of -68.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNVX and KO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.00%
-13.96%
FCNVX
KO

Volatility

FCNVX vs. KO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) is 0.42%, while The Coca-Cola Company (KO) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that FCNVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.42%
3.52%
FCNVX
KO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab