PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FCNVX vs. BIL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FCNVXBIL
YTD Return5.06%4.53%
1Y Return5.84%5.28%
3Y Return (Ann)3.84%3.63%
5Y Return (Ann)2.60%2.26%
10Y Return (Ann)2.03%1.55%
Sharpe Ratio3.6620.36
Sortino Ratio14.19273.01
Omega Ratio4.47158.62
Calmar Ratio58.28482.85
Martin Ratio127.564,446.78
Ulcer Index0.05%0.00%
Daily Std Dev1.59%0.26%
Max Drawdown-2.19%-0.77%
Current Drawdown0.00%-0.01%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.0

The correlation between FCNVX and BIL is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FCNVX vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FCNVX achieves a 5.06% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 4.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FCNVX has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 2.03%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 1.55% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.89%
2.56%
FCNVX
BIL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCNVX vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNVX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FCNVX
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class
Expense ratio chart for FCNVX: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for BIL: current value at 0.14% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.14%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCNVX vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCNVX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCNVX, currently valued at 3.66, compared to the broader market0.002.004.003.66
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCNVX, currently valued at 14.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0014.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FCNVX, currently valued at 4.47, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.004.47
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCNVX, currently valued at 58.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.0058.28
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FCNVX, currently valued at 127.56, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00127.56
BIL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BIL, currently valued at 19.94, compared to the broader market0.002.004.0019.94
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BIL, currently valued at 270.12, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.00270.12
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BIL, currently valued at 156.95, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.00156.95
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BIL, currently valued at 477.61, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00477.61
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BIL, currently valued at 4398.49, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004,398.49

FCNVX vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.66, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 20.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNVX and BIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio5.0010.0015.0020.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.66
19.94
FCNVX
BIL

Dividends

FCNVX vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

FCNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, more than BIL's 5.15% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FCNVX
Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class
5.26%4.97%1.65%0.29%1.01%2.46%2.20%1.30%0.93%0.54%0.39%0.62%
BIL
SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
5.15%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCNVX vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNVX drawdown since its inception was -2.19%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNVX and BIL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-0.10%-0.08%-0.06%-0.04%-0.02%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-0.01%
FCNVX
BIL

Volatility

FCNVX vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) has a higher volatility of 0.42% compared to SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.08%. This indicates that FCNVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%0.10%0.20%0.30%0.40%0.50%0.60%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.42%
0.08%
FCNVX
BIL