FCNTX vs. IVOG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) and IVOG (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF) are both funds - FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while IVOG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, FCNTX returned 17.43%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for IVOG. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCNTX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IVOG.

Performance

FCNTX vs. IVOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCNTX achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly lower than IVOG's 19.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FCNTX has outperformed IVOG with an annualized return of 17.43%, while IVOG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.61% annualized return.

FCNTX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 7.76%
• 6M: 10.05%
• 1Y: 23.72%
• 3Y*: 26.93%
• 5Y*: 15.12%
• 10Y*: 17.43%

IVOG

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 5.95%
• YTD: 19.25%
• 6M: 19.31%
• 1Y: 30.31%
• 3Y*: 18.06%
• 5Y*: 8.64%
• 10Y*: 11.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCNTX vs. IVOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	7.76%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF	19.25%	7.34%	15.62%	17.36%	-19.08%	18.85%	22.60%	26.13%	-10.58%	19.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FCNTX and IVOG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010	0.80

The correlation between FCNTX and IVOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCNTX vs. IVOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCNTX	IVOG
Technology	27.0%	21.9%
Communication Services	21.2%	1.5%
Financial Services	13.8%	7.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	8.0%
Healthcare	9.2%	13.5%
Industrials	8.6%	30.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	2.1%
Energy	3.6%	3.7%
Basic Materials	2.1%	3.6%
Utilities	0.5%	2.0%
Real Estate	0.1%	5.5%

Return for Risk

FCNTX vs. IVOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 35
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

IVOG

IVOG Risk / Return Rank: 56
IVOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
IVOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
IVOG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
IVOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
IVOG Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCNTX vs. IVOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCNTX	IVOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.78	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	2.56	-0.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.31	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	3.14	-1.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.04	12.34	-3.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCNTX vs. IVOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCNTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the IVOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCNTX and IVOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCNTX	IVOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	1.78	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.42	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.57	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.64	+0.13

Drawdowns

FCNTX vs. IVOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCNTX drawdown since its inception was -49.19%, which is greater than IVOG's maximum drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNTX and IVOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCNTX	IVOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.19%	-39.32%	-9.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.30%	-9.69%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.75%	-25.61%	+5.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.59%	-29.31%	-3.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.59%	-39.32%	+6.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	0.00%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.16%	-5.88%	-2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	2.46%	+0.19%

Volatility

FCNTX vs. IVOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) is 3.26%, while Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that FCNTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCNTX	IVOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.26%	5.18%	-1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.48%	13.19%	-2.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.03%	17.14%	-3.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.15%	20.61%	-1.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.68%	20.59%	-0.91%

FCNTX vs. IVOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCNTX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOG's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCNTX vs. IVOG - Dividend Comparison

FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than IVOG's 0.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.33%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF	0.54%	0.64%	0.79%	1.15%	1.05%	0.47%	0.74%	1.17%	1.01%	0.93%	1.11%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCNTX and IVOG in my portfolio?

FCNTX and IVOG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCNTX or IVOG?

IVOG has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNTX dropped -49.19% vs IVOG's -39.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.