FCNCA vs. RF
FCNCA (First Citizens BancShares, Inc.) and RF (Regions Financial Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, FCNCA returned 23.31%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for RF. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FCNCA vs. RF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCNCA achieves a -1.66% return, which is significantly lower than RF's 16.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FCNCA has outperformed RF with an annualized return of 23.31%, while RF has yielded a comparatively lower 17.39% annualized return.
FCNCA
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- -0.13%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 22.34%
- 10Y*
- 23.31%
RF
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 6.15%
- 6M
- 12.06%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 1Y
- 30.88%
- 3Y*
- 23.91%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
FCNCA vs. RF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNCA First Citizens BancShares, Inc. | -1.66% | 1.99% | 49.46% | 87.73% | -8.35% | 44.83% | 8.35% | 41.64% | -6.12% | 13.92% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 16.86% | 21.99% | 27.00% | -5.69% | 2.33% | 39.39% | -1.61% | 33.35% | -20.59% | 22.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCNCA and RF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 1992 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, FCNCA and RF have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
FCNCA:
$24.40B
RF:
$26.51B
FCNCA:
$182.32
RF:
$2.53
FCNCA:
11.55
RF:
12.30
FCNCA:
1.80
RF:
2.84
FCNCA:
1.24
RF:
1.55
FCNCA:
$14.45B
RF:
$9.62B
FCNCA:
$9.08B
RF:
$7.29B
FCNCA:
$3.47B
RF:
$2.90B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCNCA vs. RF — Risk / Return Rank
FCNCA
RF
FCNCA vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Citizens BancShares, Inc. (FCNCA) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCNCA | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.23 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 1.68 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 3.99 | -4.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCNCA vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCNCA drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCNCA and RF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCNCA | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.51% | -92.65% | +29.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.00% | -18.45% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.51% | -32.35% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.63% | -40.99% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.48% | -60.73% | +13.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | 0.00% | -9.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.95% | -31.00% | +17.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.23% | 7.76% | +3.47% |
Volatility
FCNCA vs. RF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Citizens BancShares, Inc. (FCNCA) is 5.70%, while Regions Financial Corporation (RF) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that FCNCA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCNCA | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 6.32% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.45% | 18.15% | +2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.42% | 24.83% | +2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.50% | 31.26% | +10.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.91% | 35.65% | +2.26% |
Dividends
FCNCA vs. RF - Dividend Comparison
FCNCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than RF's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNCA First Citizens BancShares, Inc. | 0.39% | 0.37% | 0.33% | 0.27% | 0.28% | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.31% | 0.34% | 0.46% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 3.41% | 5.12% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% |
Financials
FCNCA vs. RF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Citizens BancShares, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FCNCA vs. RF - Profitability Comparison
FCNCA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Citizens BancShares, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.31B and revenue of 3.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.5%.
RF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.78B and revenue of 2.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.6%.
FCNCA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Citizens BancShares, Inc. reported an operating income of 705.00M and revenue of 3.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.
RF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 714.00M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.7%.
FCNCA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Citizens BancShares, Inc. reported a net income of 534.00M and revenue of 3.48B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
RF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 559.00M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FCNCA and RF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RF has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to FCNCA (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCNCA dropped -63.51% vs RF's -92.65%.
RF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCNCA and RF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer