PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCLD vs. IYW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCLD vs. IYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCLD achieves a 34.57% return, which is significantly higher than IYW's 29.03% return.


FCLD

1D
-2.61%
1M
19.91%
YTD
34.57%
6M
36.74%
1Y
45.14%
3Y*
28.24%
5Y*
10Y*

IYW

1D
-0.92%
1M
16.53%
YTD
29.03%
6M
28.22%
1Y
59.52%
3Y*
35.24%
5Y*
22.87%
10Y*
26.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCLD vs. IYW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FCLD
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF
34.57%8.19%21.80%53.05%-41.32%-1.32%
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
29.03%25.38%30.25%65.44%-34.83%11.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FCLD and IYW is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021

0.81

The correlation between FCLD and IYW shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCLD vs. IYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCLD
FCLD Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FCLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLD Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

IYW
IYW Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYW Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCLD vs. IYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCLDIYWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.48

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.36

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

11.00

-4.18

FCLD vs. IYW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the IYW Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCLD and IYW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCLDIYWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.98

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.35

-0.02

Drawdowns

FCLD vs. IYW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCLD drawdown since its inception was -50.85%, smaller than the maximum IYW drawdown of -81.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCLD and IYW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCLDIYWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.85%

-81.90%

+31.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.48%

-17.81%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.80%

-26.47%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.00%

-0.92%

-3.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.51%

-34.66%

+14.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.64%

5.43%

+1.21%

Volatility

FCLD vs. IYW - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) at 6.30%. This indicates that FCLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCLDIYWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.45%

6.30%

+4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.07%

15.85%

+6.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.40%

20.09%

+7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.50%

25.87%

+4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.50%

25.09%

+5.41%

FCLD vs. IYW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IYW's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCLD vs. IYW - Dividend Comparison

FCLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than IYW's 0.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCLD
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF
0.02%0.03%0.13%0.17%0.26%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
0.11%0.14%0.21%0.34%0.50%0.31%0.56%0.72%0.92%0.82%1.14%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCLD and IYW have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCLD has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to IYW (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCLD dropped -50.85% vs IYW's -81.90%.

On 3-year performance, IYW leads with 35.24% vs 28.24% for FCLD. On fees, IYW is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYW has been the lower-risk option at 6.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IYW has performed better with a 35.24% return vs 28.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYW is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FCLD.

IYW has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.02% for FCLD.

FCLD tracks Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IYW tracks Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FCLD and 0.38% for IYW.

IYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCLD and IYW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer