FCIGX vs. VB
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class I (FCIGX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB).
FCIGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004. VB is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Performance
FCIGX vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCIGX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCIGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class I | -5.51% | 11.17% | 20.53% | 19.01% | -25.35% | 10.45% | 36.36% | 36.31% | -4.57% | 28.97% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.92% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCIGX achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FCIGX has outperformed VB with an annualized return of 12.75%, while VB has yielded a comparatively lower 10.51% annualized return.
FCIGX
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -10.07%
- YTD
- -5.51%
- 6M
- -2.57%
- 1Y
- 18.06%
- 3Y*
- 12.03%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 12.75%
VB
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -5.13%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 3.76%
- 1Y
- 19.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCIGX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCIGX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCIGX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
FCIGX
VB
FCIGX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class I (FCIGX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCIGX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | 0.91 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 1.41 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.39 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 5.97 | -1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCIGX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 0.91 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.26 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.49 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.42 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCIGX and VB is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCIGX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
FCIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.74%, more than VB's 1.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCIGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class I | 6.74% | 6.37% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.19% | 8.16% | 5.29% | 14.29% | 6.87% | 0.76% | 4.32% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.34% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Drawdowns
FCIGX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCIGX drawdown since its inception was -61.04%, roughly equal to the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCIGX and VB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCIGX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.04% | -59.56% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -14.29% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.05% | -28.15% | -10.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.05% | -42.05% | +3.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.12% | -6.08% | -7.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.41% | -8.49% | -2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 3.32% | +0.32% |
Volatility
FCIGX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class I (FCIGX) has a higher volatility of 8.40% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 6.84%. This indicates that FCIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCIGX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.40% | 6.84% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.04% | 12.60% | +3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.51% | 21.86% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 20.78% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.68% | 21.40% | +1.28% |