FCG vs. HUBB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FCG (First Trust Natural Gas ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index, while HUBB (Hubbell Incorporated) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FCG returned 4.65%/yr vs 19.02%/yr for HUBB. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FCG vs. HUBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCG achieves a 27.71% return, which is significantly higher than HUBB's 9.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FCG has underperformed HUBB with an annualized return of 4.65%, while HUBB has yielded a comparatively higher 19.02% annualized return.

FCG

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: -6.03%
• YTD: 27.71%
• 6M: 20.12%
• 1Y: 32.99%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 16.52%
• 10Y*: 4.65%

HUBB

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -5.74%
• YTD: 9.81%
• 6M: 13.59%
• 1Y: 25.81%
• 3Y*: 19.63%
• 5Y*: 22.30%
• 10Y*: 19.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCG vs. HUBB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF	27.71%	-2.28%	4.16%	2.55%	47.24%	98.49%	-23.20%	-15.76%	-34.81%	-11.38%
HUBB Hubbell Incorporated	9.81%	7.43%	28.94%	42.40%	15.08%	35.60%	8.89%	52.88%	-24.61%	18.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FCG and HUBB is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2015	0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between FCG and HUBB has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FCG vs. HUBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCG

FCG Risk / Return Rank: 36
FCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FCG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FCG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

HUBB

HUBB Risk / Return Rank: 66
HUBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
HUBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
HUBB Omega Ratio Rank: 61
HUBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
HUBB Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCG vs. HUBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCG	HUBB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	0.91	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	1.40	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.17	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	1.49	+1.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.56	4.21	+1.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCG vs. HUBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the HUBB Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCG and HUBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCG	HUBB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	0.91	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.77	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	0.66	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	0.66	-0.77

Drawdowns

FCG vs. HUBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCG drawdown since its inception was -97.20%, which is greater than HUBB's maximum drawdown of -41.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCG and HUBB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCG	HUBB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.20%	-41.63%	-55.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.07%	-17.36%	+4.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.44%	-32.65%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.33%	-32.65%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.04%	-41.63%	-43.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.25%	-12.81%	-61.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.38%	-7.41%	-57.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.95%	6.14%	-0.19%

Volatility

FCG vs. HUBB - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) at 7.30%. This indicates that FCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCG	HUBB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.60%	7.30%	+2.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.15%	22.21%	-2.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.75%	28.59%	-1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.46%	29.17%	+4.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.30%	28.78%	+9.52%

Dividends

FCG vs. HUBB - Dividend Comparison

FCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than HUBB's 1.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF	2.15%	2.86%	2.76%	3.25%	3.04%	1.73%	3.82%	2.87%	1.46%	1.56%	1.70%	4.79%
HUBB Hubbell Incorporated	1.15%	1.21%	1.19%	1.39%	1.82%	1.92%	2.37%	2.32%	3.17%	2.12%	2.22%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCG and HUBB in my portfolio?

FCG and HUBB have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCG or HUBB?

FCG has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to HUBB (7.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCG dropped -97.20% vs HUBB's -41.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.