PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCA vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCA achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FCA has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 7.88%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.


FCA

1D
0.13%
1M
2.89%
6M
-13.34%
YTD
-1.73%
1Y
11.99%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
7.88%
ALL TIME*
2.82%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$167.08K$290.49K$1.96M
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M

FCA vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
-1.73%45.20%14.07%-8.28%-17.61%-0.65%11.80%18.72%-18.30%60.26%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.03%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FCA and SCHD is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.32

The correlation between FCA and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCA vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCA
SCHD

Industrials

22.3%
7.8%

Financial Services

21.0%
9.9%

Basic Materials

17.2%
1.2%

Technology

15.2%
12.7%

Energy

13.5%
14.1%

Healthcare

3.2%
20.8%

Communication Services

2.7%
6.2%

Utilities

2.4%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
7.7%

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
20.6%

Industrials

FCA
22.3%
SCHD
7.8%

Financial Services

FCA
21.0%
SCHD
9.9%

Basic Materials

FCA
17.2%
SCHD
1.2%

Technology

FCA
15.2%
SCHD
12.7%

Energy

FCA
13.5%
SCHD
14.1%

Healthcare

FCA
3.2%
SCHD
20.8%

Communication Services

FCA
2.7%
SCHD
6.2%

Utilities

FCA
2.4%
SCHD
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FCA
1.0%
SCHD
7.7%

Real Estate

FCA
1.0%
SCHD

-

Consumer Defensive

FCA
0.5%
SCHD
20.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCA vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCA
FCA Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCA Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCA Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCASCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.51

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

6.74

-6.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.23

17.01

-15.79

FCA vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCA Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCA and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCA drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCA and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCASCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-33.37%

-12.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.11%

-4.61%

-19.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.13%

-16.13%

-10.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.47%

-16.85%

-25.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-33.37%

-9.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.71%

-1.24%

-18.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.61%

-3.30%

-18.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.38%

1.82%

+6.56%

Volatility

FCA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 4.11%. This indicates that FCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCASCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

4.11%

+2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.02%

8.11%

+9.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.46%

11.13%

+12.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.77%

14.39%

+13.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.74%

16.72%

+10.02%

FCA vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

FCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than SCHD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
2.87%2.67%5.17%5.70%6.00%4.91%4.12%3.73%3.10%2.30%2.51%4.13%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCA and SCHD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCA has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to SCHD (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCA dropped -45.56% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.76% vs 7.88% for FCA. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FCA.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.87% for FCA.

FCA is categorized as China Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FCA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX China Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FCA and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCA and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer