FBY vs. CN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while CN is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China All Shares. FBY is actively managed, while CN is passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.

Performance

FBY vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FBY

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.92%
• YTD: -9.36%
• 6M: -8.42%
• 1Y: -10.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBY vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	-9.36%	1.98%	44.42%	15.65%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.10%	-14.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FBY and CN is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023	0.11

Return for Risk

FBY vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBY

FBY Risk / Return Rank: 5
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBY vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBY	CN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.37	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.33	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.63	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBY	CN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FBY	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.10%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.80%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBY	CN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.15%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.73%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.46%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.46%	—	—

FBY vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBY vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.90%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	57.90%	55.43%	53.89%	8.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBY and CN in my portfolio?

FBY and CN have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FBY or CN?

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBY or CN?

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for FBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBY or CN?

FBY has the higher dividend yield at 57.90%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

What is the main difference between FBY and CN?

FBY is categorized as Derivative Income, while CN is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for FBY and 0.50% for CN.