FBY vs. CN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN).

FBY and CN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Jul 27, 2023. CN is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares. It was launched on Apr 30, 2014.

Performance

FBY vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBY vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	-11.64%	1.98%	44.42%	15.65%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.10%	-14.39%

Returns By Period

FBY

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -10.78%
• YTD: -11.64%
• 6M: -18.62%
• 1Y: -6.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBY vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

FBY

YieldMax META Option Income ETF

CN

Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF

Return for Risk

FBY vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBY

FBY Risk / Return Rank: 8
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBY vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBY	CN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.45	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBY	CN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between FBY and CN is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FBY vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.29%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	58.29%	55.43%	53.89%	8.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FBY	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.06%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.12%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.31%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBY	CN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.94%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.42%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.38%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.38%	—	—