PortfoliosLab logo
FBNDX vs. LQD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FBNDX and LQD is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.0

Performance

FBNDX vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
110.26%
175.58%
FBNDX
LQD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FBNDX:

1.23

LQD:

0.88

Sortino Ratio

FBNDX:

1.83

LQD:

1.27

Omega Ratio

FBNDX:

1.22

LQD:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

FBNDX:

0.49

LQD:

0.42

Martin Ratio

FBNDX:

3.25

LQD:

2.49

Ulcer Index

FBNDX:

2.11%

LQD:

2.67%

Daily Std Dev

FBNDX:

5.57%

LQD:

7.54%

Max Drawdown

FBNDX:

-20.16%

LQD:

-24.95%

Current Drawdown

FBNDX:

-8.19%

LQD:

-9.67%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FBNDX having a 1.67% return and LQD slightly higher at 1.68%. Over the past 10 years, FBNDX has underperformed LQD with an annualized return of 1.54%, while LQD has yielded a comparatively higher 2.17% annualized return.


FBNDX

YTD

1.67%

1M

-0.50%

6M

0.86%

1Y

6.54%

5Y*

-0.67%

10Y*

1.54%

LQD

YTD

1.68%

1M

-0.52%

6M

0.20%

1Y

6.86%

5Y*

-0.39%

10Y*

2.17%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBNDX vs. LQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBNDX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LQD's 0.15% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for FBNDX: current value is 0.45%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FBNDX: 0.45%
Expense ratio chart for LQD: current value is 0.15%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
LQD: 0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FBNDX vs. LQD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBNDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBNDX is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBNDX is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBNDX is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBNDX is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBNDX is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBNDX is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

LQD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQD is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQD is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQD is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQD is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQD is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQD is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FBNDX vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBNDX, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
FBNDX: 1.23
LQD: 0.96
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBNDX, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FBNDX: 1.83
LQD: 1.37
The chart of Omega ratio for FBNDX, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
FBNDX: 1.22
LQD: 1.17
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBNDX, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
FBNDX: 0.49
LQD: 0.46
The chart of Martin ratio for FBNDX, currently valued at 3.25, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00
FBNDX: 3.25
LQD: 2.69

The current FBNDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBNDX and LQD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.23
0.96
FBNDX
LQD

Dividends

FBNDX vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

FBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than LQD's 4.45% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FBNDX
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund
3.94%3.99%3.56%2.67%1.53%1.88%2.77%2.85%2.36%2.31%2.90%2.59%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.45%4.45%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%3.39%

Drawdowns

FBNDX vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBNDX drawdown since its inception was -20.16%, smaller than the maximum LQD drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBNDX and LQD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-13.00%-12.00%-11.00%-10.00%-9.00%-8.00%-7.00%-6.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-8.19%
-9.67%
FBNDX
LQD

Volatility

FBNDX vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) is 2.23%, while iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that FBNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.23%
4.00%
FBNDX
LQD