PortfoliosLab logo
FBL vs. BAR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FBL and BAR is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FBL vs. BAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FBL:

0.90

BAR:

2.53

Sortino Ratio

FBL:

1.53

BAR:

3.32

Omega Ratio

FBL:

1.20

BAR:

1.42

Calmar Ratio

FBL:

1.00

BAR:

5.53

Martin Ratio

FBL:

2.70

BAR:

15.05

Ulcer Index

FBL:

22.20%

BAR:

2.95%

Daily Std Dev

FBL:

74.12%

BAR:

17.93%

Max Drawdown

FBL:

-59.80%

BAR:

-21.53%

Current Drawdown

FBL:

-24.97%

BAR:

-1.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a 16.36% return, which is significantly lower than BAR's 28.78% return.


FBL

YTD

16.36%

1M

24.14%

6M

12.28%

1Y

65.92%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BAR

YTD

28.78%

1M

4.58%

6M

28.13%

1Y

44.96%

3Y*

22.05%

5Y*

14.54%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GraniteShares Gold Shares

FBL vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FBL vs. BAR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBL is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBL is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBL is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBL is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBL is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBL is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

BAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAR is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAR is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAR is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAR is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAR is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAR is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FBL vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the BAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBL and BAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FBL vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBL nor BAR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%51.58%
BAR
GraniteShares Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FBL vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -59.80%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and BAR.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FBL vs. BAR - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a higher volatility of 20.94% compared to GraniteShares Gold Shares (BAR) at 7.95%. This indicates that FBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...