PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBKFX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBKFX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBKFX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FBKFX
Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund
-1.79%15.68%16.19%21.93%-17.87%18.51%22.38%10.57%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%11.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBKFX achieves a -1.79% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return.


FBKFX

1D
2.10%
1M
-3.89%
YTD
-1.79%
6M
1.04%
1Y
16.16%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBKFX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBKFX
FBKFX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FBKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FBKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBKFX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBKFX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

0.92

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.03

1.41

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.21

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.41

+0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.93

6.61

+2.32

FBKFX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBKFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBKFX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBKFX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

0.92

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.61

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.46

+0.36

Correlation

The correlation between FBKFX and ^GSPC is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

FBKFX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBKFX drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBKFX and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBKFX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-56.78%

+30.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-12.14%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

-25.43%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.65%

-5.78%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-10.75%

+6.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

2.60%

-0.82%

Volatility

FBKFX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) is 4.26%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that FBKFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBKFX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

5.37%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

9.55%

-2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

18.33%

-6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.26%

16.90%

-4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.27%

18.05%

-3.78%