PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBGRX vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBGRX vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FBGRX having a 18.48% return and SCHD slightly higher at 18.75%. Over the past 10 years, FBGRX has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 21.81%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.64% annualized return.


FBGRX

1D
0.24%
1M
6.52%
YTD
18.48%
6M
18.98%
1Y
43.04%
3Y*
32.59%
5Y*
16.72%
10Y*
21.81%

SCHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
2.41%
YTD
18.75%
6M
18.75%
1Y
26.41%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGRX vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
18.48%19.91%39.77%55.61%-38.45%22.64%62.20%33.43%1.02%36.01%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.75%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FBGRX and SCHD is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between FBGRX and SCHD has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBGRX vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGRX
FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGRX vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBGRXSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

6.07

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.71

14.90

-0.19

FBGRX vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBGRX and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBGRXSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.55

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.58

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.76

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.86

-0.18

Drawdowns

FBGRX vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBGRX drawdown since its inception was -58.64%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGRX and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBGRXSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.64%

-33.37%

-25.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-4.61%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.07%

-16.13%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.08%

-16.85%

-26.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.08%

-33.37%

-9.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-1.61%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.53%

-3.32%

-9.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

1.88%

+1.10%

Volatility

FBGRX vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.87%. This indicates that FBGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBGRXSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

2.87%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.01%

7.61%

+5.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.41%

10.98%

+6.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.87%

14.38%

+10.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.68%

16.72%

+6.96%

FBGRX vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBGRX vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than SCHD's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
1.60%1.90%5.95%0.93%0.57%8.73%6.40%3.70%6.32%4.23%4.05%5.30%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBGRX and SCHD have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBGRX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to SCHD (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBGRX dropped -58.64% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBGRX and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer