FBGKX vs. FBGX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX).

FBGKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. FBGX is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 11, 2014.

Performance

FBGKX vs. FBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBGKX vs. FBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBGKX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K	-11.14%	19.99%	39.87%	55.76%	-38.40%	22.74%	62.35%	33.56%	1.11%	36.08%
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%	35.73%	83.74%	-56.41%	57.04%	65.79%	75.84%	-16.58%	64.01%

Returns By Period

FBGKX

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -8.96%
• YTD: -11.14%
• 6M: -8.01%
• 1Y: 22.62%
• 3Y*: 24.77%
• 5Y*: 11.24%
• 10Y*: 18.65%

FBGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGKX vs. FBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGKX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGX's 1.29% expense ratio.

FBGX

UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN

FBGKX

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K

Return for Risk

FBGKX vs. FBGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGKX

FBGKX Risk / Return Rank: 51
FBGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FBGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FBGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FBGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FBGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGKX vs. FBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBGKX	FBGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.94	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBGKX	FBGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between FBGKX and FBGX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FBGKX vs. FBGX - Dividend Comparison

FBGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, while FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGKX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K	2.12%	1.89%	6.00%	0.93%	0.56%	8.77%	6.41%	3.70%	6.41%	4.26%	4.22%	5.36%
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FBGKX	FBGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.63%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.43%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBGKX	FBGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.36%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.68%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.85%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.58%	—	—